Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:43:05 11/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2004 at 08:03:00, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On November 07, 2004 at 07:51:58, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >Hi, > >the American's have Crafty, the non available stronger Zarkov and long time not >available Socrates versions, much others new and interesting chess programs. >Only Crafty is under the TOPs of the TOPs. > >But a lof of strong amateurs, thinking on Djinn (interesting developement). > >I believe it's time to help a little bit a young amateur programmer in CCC forum >with good analyzes to create a new monster. Naum is a good address and perhpas >the members here have time to help the programmer of Naum with good analyzes. > >Much more interesting as to play game 1.000 with the older Nimzo :-) >We have to go with the time ... > >Next year I will read here ... > >"I am not sure but it's possible that Naum is now stronger as Gandalf" >Sorry Steen ... > >But the stronger fora with all the members have to help a little bit the >developers of chess engines! > >In the latest months I missed such good messages in WWW and I am sure we have >here enough strong chess players. Isn't it? > >Thinking about my words! >Also the other programmers with comments about Naum. >Not only the own developement is interesting ... > >Best >Frank There are many new strong programs and not only naum. I see no reason to prefer naum and not thinker or gothmog or fruit or etchess. I also believe that movei can improve significantly if I implement some basic stuff. I believe that Movei has more original ideas relative to programs at similiar level and it's relative disadvantage is that it is missing some basic stuff that is implemented in other programs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.