Author: Andrew Walker
Date: 17:15:46 11/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2004 at 06:14:17, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On November 04, 2004 at 22:23:56, Andrew Walker wrote: > >>On November 04, 2004 at 14:23:09, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >> >>>On November 04, 2004 at 13:41:03, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>>I was not complaining, but only making things more clear. >>> >>>Yes, why not so we have a nice disucss and the others can read it too. >>> >>>>I am making huge pressure on SMK to make higher improvements...unfortunately I >>>>am never enough satisfied... >>> >>>That is professional thinking of course! >>> >>>>This is true, but an improvemnt of less than 50 points is not easy to see... >>> >>>Yes, for me only with a lot of games :-( >>> >>>>Yes, I think Shredder is one of the most important programs of CB. >>> >>>Shredder is the most important program we have today. >>>Simple: Shredder is the number one! >>> >>>>I do not like to speak about other chess programs to avoid missunderstandings, >>>>but I have a lot of respect of the Gandalf team. >>>>I believe the program is clearly stronger, so the customers should be happy with >>>>it. >>>>I have not seen it yet, so mine is just an impression based on what I am >>>>expecting. >>> >>>Here you must understand my position! >>> >>>The positions I have in the latest five-six years from the work I do: >>> >>>- Group building for make more! >>>- Animation for get more! >>>- Compatibility for get more! >>>- Support for get more! >>> >>>For get more: >>>If I try this I have the result to have more in the future for my own interest. >>>So you can see that I am thinking on myself with the work I made too. >>> >>>I wrote Gandalf and Shredder: >>>Booth programs are important: >>> >>>- Shredder supported a standard protocol (UCI), is the strongest program we >>>have, good endgame, nice openings, good positional computer chess. >>> >>>- Gandalf supported a standard protocol (UCI and WB), have the most interesting >>>middelgame, played the most shortest games vs. other top programs and we have >>>fire on the board. >>> >>>And now Sandro: >>>A user asked ... what is a good combination for my fast PC to analyze games. >>>The right answer is Shredder in combination with Gandalf and all the strong >>>amateurs we have because each amateur have a selection it's very good. Example >>>Yace in endgame. >>> >>>Booth programs are interesting for users because users can used booth program >>>under all available GUIs. For me is absolutely clear, my commercial favorits >>>from the "older" available commercial engines. Like Hiarcs too but the program >>>is for me not interesting because the engine support is bad. >>> >> >>What do you mean by this? The last few releases have been about 1 year apart, >>and according to the author a new one is very possible by the end of the year. >> >>Andrew > >Hi Andrew, > >what did you mean exactly? >Have understanding problems. > Frank, I'm just wondering what you mean by "engine support" Do you mean support for problems, frequency of upgrades or something else? Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.