Author: Daniel Mehrmannn
Date: 11:35:45 11/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
strg+c strg+v of my e-mail: Hello Tim, basicly you're right :) But i don't see that as a extension in the own reflect of the protocol (feature=x element). Its more a information for the engine, nothing more ! And i thought it should be only support the current features above wb2 in the GUI's. That shouldn't called that the GUI begin to add new features !! Maybe i wrote that wrong in my first message. But okay the rsik is very high that other GUI's beginn to add not offical features and than we have a nightmare. I don't wanna use the "feature=x" syntax, because that would be a real extension and all new real extensions should _not_ go into wb2, it should go into wb3. And at the moment i don't do this job. With the "gui" command its not my target to go to wb3. It should only be "hotfix" for all wb2 GUIs. But okay, i respect your direction and i will remove the stuff soon. -- Daniel Mehrmann Softwaredeveloper project Bustra 3.0 fiscus GmbH http://www.fiscus-gmbh.com Phone +492282807182 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tim Mann [mailto:tim@tim-mann.org] Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. November 2004 01:55 An: Daniel Mehrmann Cc: xboard-devel@gnu.org; tim@tim-mann.org; buers@gmx.de Betreff: Re: [XBoard-devel] New wb2 protocol command "gui" It would be better to define a new "feature" command for each feature that other GUIs have and xboard doesn't. That's how the protocol is supposed to be extended. Either way, you'll have to get the other GUI authors to start supporting this addition for it to be of any use to engine authors. On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 23:29:03 +0100, Daniel Mehrmann <daniel.mehrmann@gmx.de> wrote:
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.