Author: stuart taylor
Date: 05:35:49 11/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2004 at 19:42:08, Mike Byrne wrote: >On November 08, 2004 at 14:47:40, tom davis wrote: > >>I currently own cm9000 and was wondering if there are any significant strenth >>increase in the new 10th edition >>thnaks > > >For you to notice personally - most likely none, zippo . Assumimg you are >rated under 2000 there is simply no way for you tell CM10K is stronger than CM9K >simply by playing the engine. They are simply too strong. This is so obvious that I never understand why this is so often repeated, when I or others ask these questions. If I was a 5-year-old asking the question for the first time (or even older) I would agree the answer was appropriate. The purposes I would want to know which is stronger are many, but certainly not included is because I want to know if it will be a better challenge for me to try and beat! If I would ask which is faster, a jumbo or a different kind of flight, it wouldn't be because I want to try running practice against it. I would know only too well, that a regular sports car would be enough of a challenge, or even a cadilac! S.Taylor > If you run engine >vs engine matches , you might be able to tell - but Ithink the jury is still out >on which one is stronger. It might be tad stronger,
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.