Author: Albert Silver
Date: 17:29:58 11/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2004 at 20:26:53, Albert Silver wrote:
>On November 09, 2004 at 17:35:23, John Merlino wrote:
>
>>On November 09, 2004 at 15:42:04, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On November 09, 2004 at 09:22:41, Dom Leste wrote:
>>>
>>>>Here Pro Deo Search & Destroy played 29. Nf5! Is Be3 equally good? Probably yes
>>>>if your engine more positionally inclined ;) Nf5 or Be3 Any takers :)
>>>>
>>>>[D]r3k3/2q2pb1/pnbpn1p1/8/2pPP1Nr/2P3N1/1P1B1Q1P/R2BKR2 w q - 0 1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[Event "Arena tournament"]
>>>>[Site "USER"]
>>>>[Date "2004.11.09"]
>>>>[Round "4"]
>>>>[White "Aristarch 4.50"]
>>>>[Black "Pro Deo S&D67"]
>>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>>[ECO "B02"]
>>>>[Opening "Alekhine"]
>>>>[Time "23:35:34"]
>>>>[Variation "Sämisch Attack"]
>>>>[TimeControl "1800+10"]
>>>>
>>>>1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.Nc3 e6 4.Nxd5 exd5 5.d4 d6 6.Bf4 dxe5 7.dxe5 c5 8.Nf3 Nc6
>>>>9.c3 h6 10.Bd3 Be6 11.h3 Be7 12.Qd2 Qb6 13.O-O Rd8 14.Rfd1 g5 15.Bg3 d4 16.Be4
>>>>Rg8 17.Qe2 g4 18.hxg4 Rxg4 19.cxd4 cxd4 20.Kh1 Nb4 21.Nh2 Rg7 22.a3 d3 23.Bxd3
>>>>Rxd3 24.Rxd3 Nxd3 25.Qxd3 Qxb2 26.Rb1 Qxa3 27.Qb5+ Kf8 28.Qxb7 Kg8 29.Qa8+ Bf8
>>>>30.Qd8 Rg5 31.Rd1 Kh7 32.Rb1 Bf5 33.Re1 Be7 34.Qd5 Bg6 35.Nf3 Rh5+ 36.Kg1 Bc5
>>>>37.Bh4 Qb4 38.Rf1 Bf8 39.Bf6 Bg7 40.Bxg7 Kxg7 41.Qd7 a5 42.e6 Qb5 43.Rd1 Kg8
>>>>44.Nh4 fxe6 {Black resigns} 1-0
>>>
>>>CM9_T05 on P4 1.8/32 MB hash, CM9-GUI
>>>
>>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves
>>>0:09 1/8 0.78 1101741 1.Be3 Qe7 2.d5 Nxd5 3.exd5 Bxd5
>>> 4.Nf6+ Bxf6 5.Qxf6 Qxf6 6.Rxf6
>>> Rxh2 7.Rf2
>>>0:16 1/8 0.93 1941177 1.Nf6+ Kf8 2.Nf5 Rxe4+ 3.Nxe4 gxf5
>>> 4.Ng3 Re8 5.Be2 f4 6.Bxf4
>>>0:37 1/9 0.61 4820646 1.Nf6+ Bxf6 2.Qxf6 Rxh2 3.Bg4 Qe7
>>> 4.Qxe7+ Kxe7 5.d5 Nxd5 6.exd5 Bxd5
>>> 7.Rf2 Rh4 8.Be2 Rb8
>>>0:48 1/9 0.98 6156492 1.Be3 Kf8 2.d5 Nxd5 3.exd5 Bxd5
>>> 4.Nf6 Nf4 5.Nxd5 Nxd5 6.Bf3 Nxe3
>>> 7.Bxa8 Nxf1 8.Kxf1
>>>1:25 1/10 0.71 10796791 1.Be3 Qe7 2.d5 Nxd5 3.exd5 Bxd5
>>> 4.Bf3 Bxf3 5.Qxf3 Rb8 6.Rxa6 Rxb2
>>> 7.Ra8+ Nd8 8.Ne4
>>>2:19 1/10 0.82 17535849 1.Ra5 Bb5 2.e5 dxe5 3.Ne4 Rxg4
>>> 4.Bxg4 f5 5.Bxf5 gxf5 6.Qxf5 Qe7
>>> 7.Qg6+ Kd8 8.Bg5
>>>2:46 1/10 1.08 21111397 1.Nf5 gxf5 2.Qxh4 fxg4 3.Bxg4 Nf8
>>> 4.Bf5 Rb8 5.Rxa6 Ne6 6.Ra2
>>>3:01 1/11 0.94 23251874 1.Nf5 gxf5 2.Qxh4 fxg4 3.Bxg4 Nf8
>>> 4.Bf5 Rb8 5.Rxa6 Ne6 6.Rg1
>>>5:03 1/12 1.11 40164102 1.Nf5 gxf5 2.Qxh4 fxg4 3.Bxg4 Qe7
>>> 4.Qxe7+ Kxe7 5.d5 Nxd5 6.exd5 Bxd5
>>> 7.Ra5 Nc5 8.Be3 Bg2 9.Rf2
>>
>>Kurt,
>>
>>If you could, let T05 go another depth or two. SKR switched to Be2!? after
>>10:00, and I wonder if T05 would do the same thing.
>>
>>jm
>
>I have a question that's completely beside the point but nags me a bit. I've
>seen at least 3 top notch results, one of which is a strong blitz testing,
I meant to add the link:
http://www.grailmaster.com/misc/chess/comp/cm.html
>that
>seem to indicate that the CM9000 R1 setting might be best. I've never seen a
>poor result, so I was wondering whether you knew about this, or preferred other
>settings for a reason I may not be aware of. Forgive my nosiness, it's a pure CC
>junkie's question I suppose. :-)
>
> Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.