Author: John Merlino
Date: 18:01:59 11/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2004 at 20:29:58, Albert Silver wrote:
>On November 09, 2004 at 20:26:53, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On November 09, 2004 at 17:35:23, John Merlino wrote:
>>
>>>On November 09, 2004 at 15:42:04, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 09, 2004 at 09:22:41, Dom Leste wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Here Pro Deo Search & Destroy played 29. Nf5! Is Be3 equally good? Probably yes
>>>>>if your engine more positionally inclined ;) Nf5 or Be3 Any takers :)
>>>>>
>>>>>[D]r3k3/2q2pb1/pnbpn1p1/8/2pPP1Nr/2P3N1/1P1B1Q1P/R2BKR2 w q - 0 1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>[Event "Arena tournament"]
>>>>>[Site "USER"]
>>>>>[Date "2004.11.09"]
>>>>>[Round "4"]
>>>>>[White "Aristarch 4.50"]
>>>>>[Black "Pro Deo S&D67"]
>>>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>>>[ECO "B02"]
>>>>>[Opening "Alekhine"]
>>>>>[Time "23:35:34"]
>>>>>[Variation "Sämisch Attack"]
>>>>>[TimeControl "1800+10"]
>>>>>
>>>>>1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.Nc3 e6 4.Nxd5 exd5 5.d4 d6 6.Bf4 dxe5 7.dxe5 c5 8.Nf3 Nc6
>>>>>9.c3 h6 10.Bd3 Be6 11.h3 Be7 12.Qd2 Qb6 13.O-O Rd8 14.Rfd1 g5 15.Bg3 d4 16.Be4
>>>>>Rg8 17.Qe2 g4 18.hxg4 Rxg4 19.cxd4 cxd4 20.Kh1 Nb4 21.Nh2 Rg7 22.a3 d3 23.Bxd3
>>>>>Rxd3 24.Rxd3 Nxd3 25.Qxd3 Qxb2 26.Rb1 Qxa3 27.Qb5+ Kf8 28.Qxb7 Kg8 29.Qa8+ Bf8
>>>>>30.Qd8 Rg5 31.Rd1 Kh7 32.Rb1 Bf5 33.Re1 Be7 34.Qd5 Bg6 35.Nf3 Rh5+ 36.Kg1 Bc5
>>>>>37.Bh4 Qb4 38.Rf1 Bf8 39.Bf6 Bg7 40.Bxg7 Kxg7 41.Qd7 a5 42.e6 Qb5 43.Rd1 Kg8
>>>>>44.Nh4 fxe6 {Black resigns} 1-0
>>>>
>>>>CM9_T05 on P4 1.8/32 MB hash, CM9-GUI
>>>>
>>>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves
>>>>0:09 1/8 0.78 1101741 1.Be3 Qe7 2.d5 Nxd5 3.exd5 Bxd5
>>>> 4.Nf6+ Bxf6 5.Qxf6 Qxf6 6.Rxf6
>>>> Rxh2 7.Rf2
>>>>0:16 1/8 0.93 1941177 1.Nf6+ Kf8 2.Nf5 Rxe4+ 3.Nxe4 gxf5
>>>> 4.Ng3 Re8 5.Be2 f4 6.Bxf4
>>>>0:37 1/9 0.61 4820646 1.Nf6+ Bxf6 2.Qxf6 Rxh2 3.Bg4 Qe7
>>>> 4.Qxe7+ Kxe7 5.d5 Nxd5 6.exd5 Bxd5
>>>> 7.Rf2 Rh4 8.Be2 Rb8
>>>>0:48 1/9 0.98 6156492 1.Be3 Kf8 2.d5 Nxd5 3.exd5 Bxd5
>>>> 4.Nf6 Nf4 5.Nxd5 Nxd5 6.Bf3 Nxe3
>>>> 7.Bxa8 Nxf1 8.Kxf1
>>>>1:25 1/10 0.71 10796791 1.Be3 Qe7 2.d5 Nxd5 3.exd5 Bxd5
>>>> 4.Bf3 Bxf3 5.Qxf3 Rb8 6.Rxa6 Rxb2
>>>> 7.Ra8+ Nd8 8.Ne4
>>>>2:19 1/10 0.82 17535849 1.Ra5 Bb5 2.e5 dxe5 3.Ne4 Rxg4
>>>> 4.Bxg4 f5 5.Bxf5 gxf5 6.Qxf5 Qe7
>>>> 7.Qg6+ Kd8 8.Bg5
>>>>2:46 1/10 1.08 21111397 1.Nf5 gxf5 2.Qxh4 fxg4 3.Bxg4 Nf8
>>>> 4.Bf5 Rb8 5.Rxa6 Ne6 6.Ra2
>>>>3:01 1/11 0.94 23251874 1.Nf5 gxf5 2.Qxh4 fxg4 3.Bxg4 Nf8
>>>> 4.Bf5 Rb8 5.Rxa6 Ne6 6.Rg1
>>>>5:03 1/12 1.11 40164102 1.Nf5 gxf5 2.Qxh4 fxg4 3.Bxg4 Qe7
>>>> 4.Qxe7+ Kxe7 5.d5 Nxd5 6.exd5 Bxd5
>>>> 7.Ra5 Nc5 8.Be3 Bg2 9.Rf2
>>>
>>>Kurt,
>>>
>>>If you could, let T05 go another depth or two. SKR switched to Be2!? after
>>>10:00, and I wonder if T05 would do the same thing.
>>>
>>>jm
>>
>>I have a question that's completely beside the point but nags me a bit. I've
>>seen at least 3 top notch results, one of which is a strong blitz testing,
>
>I meant to add the link:
>
>http://www.grailmaster.com/misc/chess/comp/cm.html
>
>>that
>>seem to indicate that the CM9000 R1 setting might be best. I've never seen a
>>poor result, so I was wondering whether you knew about this, or preferred other
>>settings for a reason I may not be aware of. Forgive my nosiness, it's a pure CC
>>junkie's question I suppose. :-)
>>
>> Albert
I would say that the answer is probably "I'm lazy". :-)
I have been testing with SKR for a while, and since I haven't seen anybody else
test with it, then I just figured there was no reason to change.
If somebody can send me the R1 settings, I'll be happy to switch over on my AMD
machine at work. My home machine is using the CM 10th edition engine, so I'm
reluctant to try the R1 settings there as well.
jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.