Author: Graham Banks
Date: 00:44:46 11/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2004 at 22:25:46, Steven J. Brann wrote: >On November 08, 2004 at 13:54:01, Graham Banks wrote: > >>Hi Jason, >> >>I've posted these thoughts on the Winboard forum also, but as not all CCC >>members visit there, I thought some here might be interested also. >> >>As I've said all along, CM10th Edition is a definite improvement over CM9000. >>It's much more well balanced and I'm struggling to find areas where a lot of >>adjustment needs to be made to the default settings, unlike CM9000. >>Thus the Creep setting uses default positional values with slightly adjusted >>material settings and selectivity 14. >>A chess friend of mine is running a 40/2hrs tournament on a dual Opteron with >>ponder on involving all the top programs and CM 10th Default with selectivity 14 >>is half a point ahead of Shredder 8 after 14 rounds. >>Ray is giving the Creep settings a further run in a 40/2hrs tournament that he's >>currrently running also, so will keep you posted on how it goes. >> >>My thoughts on CM10th with regard to any adjustments at this stage (this could >>be my next settings try): >>Control of centre=105, possibly 110 (CM10th frequently overwhelms its opponents >>through superior flank play though) >>Mobility=100 (fine as is) >>King Safety=100, possibly 105 (seems okay in this area unlike CM9000 default) >>Passed Pawns=100 (own) 110 (opp) - needs to be a bit more careful of opponent >>passers. >>Pawn Weaknesses=115 or 120 (own) 100 (opp) >> >>Regards, Graham. > >Graham, thanks for your observations. If one were to use the King 3.33 in the >CM9 Gui, would the same settings be transmitted to the engine the same as if >they had been set that way in the CM10 Gui? > >Steve Not sure on this one Steve. I think I read somewhere that they don't. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.