Author: Pallav Nawani
Date: 10:33:11 11/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2004 at 06:27:53, Albert Silver wrote: >On November 10, 2004 at 01:25:01, Tony Nichols wrote: > >>On November 10, 2004 at 00:18:23, Peter Darin wrote: >> >>>On November 10, 2004 at 00:09:11, Tony Nichols wrote: >>> >>>>On November 09, 2004 at 23:24:20, Peter Darin wrote: >>>> >>>>>He is running away. >>>> >>>>From what? >>>>Tony >>> >>>from playing Kasparov of course whom he is afraid to play. >> >>I don't know what makes you think Kramnik is afraid to play Kasparov. After all >>he beat Kasparov for the title. There is no evidence that he is afraid. There is >>evidence that Kasparov does not want to play Kramnik. He declined to play in the >>Dortmund qualifier. He went back to fide. If Kasparov wanted to play Kramnik so >>bad he would have played in Dortmund. I think many people don't understand that >>Kramnik is trying to reform chess. Kasparov instigated the mess we have now. I >>too would like to see them play, but Kasparov should have to qualify. >>Regards, >>Tony > >I'm afraid I have to side with Peter on this one. Kramnik has been beaten by >Kasparov since the title for one thing, and he also recently decided he would >not play the superfinal against Kasparov despite the agreement that the winner >of both matches would play to unify the titles. I don't think Kramnik is trying >to reform anything at all and never heard one single word on his part suggesting >that was his intention. Alekhine, move over, you've got company. > Well, He already has Bobby Fischer's company ;) Pallav
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.