Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 11:13:44 11/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2004 at 13:50:19, Ingo Bauer wrote:
>Hello
>
>Without saying anything about Gandalf you can not trust games that where played
>on the playchess server. Have a look at blacks move 28. (Rh8 {1.64/17 454}).
>Depth 17 after 454 seconds? I know that Christian is using a rather up to date
>computer but the other one seems to be really slow or completly missconfigured
>(Hashsize? Eval?).
>On my XP@2200MHz Shredder 8 needs 29s to reach that depth even if there is
>nothing in the hash allready. 454s is like Shredder running on a 142MHz Athlon
>CPU or a XP200+ :-)!
>
Could be lag.
Ernst.
>3r4/pN4k1/2p5/1p2PpbB/2p5/8/PP4PK/3R4 b - -
>
>Engine: Shredder 8 (256 MB)
>by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
>
>12/31 0:01 -1.42 28...Bf4+ 29.Kg1 Rxd1+ 30.Bxd1 Bxe5
> 31.b3 cxb3 32.axb3 Kf6 33.Kf1 Bd4
> 34.Ke2 c5 35.Nd6 a6 (756.677) 563
>
>13/29 0:02 -1.46 28...Bf4+ 29.Kg1 Rxd1+ 30.Bxd1 Bxe5
> 31.b3 cxb3 32.axb3 Kf6 33.Kf1 Bd4
> 34.Ke2 c5 35.Nd6 a6 36.Bc2 (1.239.727) 565
>
>14/33 0:03 -1.49 28...Bf4+ 29.Kg1 Rxd1+ 30.Bxd1 Bxe5
> 31.b3 c3 32.Kf2 Kf6 33.Bc2 b4 34.Ke2 Bc7
> 35.Kd3 Ke5 36.Nc5 a5 (2.014.352) 566
>
>15/31 0:06 -1.41 28...Bf4+ 29.Kg1 Rxd1+ 30.Bxd1 Bxe5
> 31.b3 cxb3 32.axb3 c5 33.Be2 Bd4+
> 34.Kh2 a6 35.Kg3 Kf6 36.Kf4 Ke6 (3.578.557) 566
>
>15/35 0:08 -1.40++ 28...Rh8 29.Rd7+ Kf8 30.g4 fxg4
> 31.Kg3 Rxh5 32.Kxg4 Rh2 33.Rf7+ Kxf7
> 34.Nd8+ Bxd8 35.e6+ Kxe6 36.Kf4 (4.950.310) 564
>
>15/35 0:09 -1.40 28...Rh8 29.Rd7+ Kf8 30.g4 fxg4
> 31.Kg3 Rxh5 32.Kxg4 Rh2 33.Kxg5 Re2 (5.388.124) 563
>
>16/39 0:17 -1.28 28...Rh8 29.g4 Bf4+ 30.Kh3 Bxe5
> 31.Rd2 Kh6 32.Kg2 fxg4 33.Bxg4 Kg5
> 34.Bh3 Kf4 35.Re2 c3 36.Rf2+ Ke3
> 37.Rf3+ Kd2 (9.660.518) 558
>
>17/37 0:29 -1.32 28...Rh8 29.g4 Bf4+ 30.Kg2 fxg4
> 31.Rd7+ Kh6 32.Bxg4 Bxe5 33.Nd8 Kg6
> 34.b3 Rh2+ 35.Kf3 c3 36.Nxc6 Bf6
> 37.Rd1 Bg5 38.Nxa7 (16.728.060) 557
>
>18/42 1:05 -1.18 28...Rh8 29.g4 Bf4+ 30.Kg1 fxg4
> 31.Rd7+ Kh6 32.Bxg4 Rg8 33.Kf2 Bxe5
> 34.Bf3 Bxb2 35.Ke3 Rg6 36.Kd2 Kg5
> 37.Nd6 Ba3 38.Nf7+ Kf4 (36.382.782) 557
>
>19/47 1:40 -1.43-- 28...Rh8 29.g4 Bf4+ 30.Kg1 fxg4
> 31.Rd7+ Kh6 32.Bxg4 Rg8 33.e6 Rxg4+
> 34.Kf2 Be5 35.e7 Bg3+ 36.Ke3 Re4+
> 37.Kxe4 Kg5 38.e8Q c3 (55.503.198) 549
>
>19/47 2:18 -1.53 28...Rh8 29.g4 Bf4+ 30.Kh3 Bxe5
> 31.Rd2 Kf6 32.Kh4 fxg4 33.Kxg4 Ke7
> 34.Nc5 Rf8 35.Bg6 (74.754.301) 540
>
>20/45 3:59 -1.61 28...Rh8 29.g4 Bf4+ 30.Kh3 Bxe5
> 31.Rd2 Kf6 32.Kh4 fxg4 33.Kxg4 Bc7
> 34.Rf2+ Ke5 35.Re2+ Kd4 36.Be8 Rg8+
> 37.Kh5 Rh8+ 38.Kg5 Bd8+ 39.Nxd8 (127.108.921) 530
>
>best move: Rd8-h8 time: 4:26.263 min n/s: 529.932 CPU 99.5% n/s(1CPU):
>532.594 nodes: 141.101.381
>
>After the rook sac of gandalf (nice move!) La-Sirene needs 4 minutes to reach
>depth 14. My comp is doing this in a little less than 1 min (Empty hash! La
>Sirene running on a 550Mhz XP?). I susspect something else was running on that
>computer as well. The problem with the sac is that a "normal" comp might have
>seen it earlier. On my comp S8 is declining the sac after 2min and 52s.
>
>r4b2/pb2k3/1qp1pR2/1p2n1NB/2pP3P/2N3r1/PP4P1/R2Q2K1 b - -
>
>Engine: Shredder 8 (256 MB)
>by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
>
>10/33 0:01 +1.55++ 19...Kxf6 20.Nce4+ Ke7 21.Nxg3 Rd8
> 22.Ne2 Bg7 23.Qc1 Nd3 24.Kh1 Nxc1
> 25.Nxe6 Kxe6 26.Nf4+ Kd7 (743.300) 426
>
>10/33 0:02 +1.72 19...Kxf6 20.Nce4+ Ke7 21.Nxg3 Rd8
> 22.Ne2 Bg7 23.Qd2 Nd3 24.Nf3 c5
> 25.Qg5+ Bf6 26.Qg6 Rf8 27.Qh7+ Kd6
> 28.Qh6 Qd8 (1.164.403) 425
>
>11/37 0:06 +1.47-- 19...Kxf6 20.Kh2 Rd3 21.Qf1+ Nf3+
> 22.Nxf3 Ke7 23.Ng5 Qc7+ 24.Kg1 Qh2+
> 25.Kxh2 Rh3+ 26.gxh3 (2.574.380) 422
>
>11/37 0:09 +0.98 19...Kxf6 20.Kh2 Rxg5 21.hxg5+ Ke7
> 22.dxe5 Qc5 23.Qf3 Qxe5+ 24.Kg1 Qxg5
> 25.Qf7+ Kd6 26.Qxb7 Qxh5 27.Qxa8 Qh2+
> 28.Kxh2 (3.951.692) 418
>
>12/41 0:20 +0.93 19...Kxf6 20.Kh2 Rxg5 21.hxg5+ Ke7
> 22.dxe5 Qc5 23.Qf3 Qxe5+ 24.Kh1 Qf5
> 25.Qg3 Kd7 26.Rd1+ Kc8 27.Be8 Qh7+
> 28.Qh3 Qxh3+ 29.gxh3 c5+ 30.Kg1 a6 (8.713.324) 434
>
>13/40 0:30 +0.68-- 19...Kxf6 20.Kh2 Rxg5 21.hxg5+ Ke7
> 22.dxe5 Qc5 23.Qf3 Qxe5+ 24.Kh1 Qf5
> 25.Qg3 Kd7 26.Rd1+ Kc8 27.Be8 Qh7+
> 28.Kg1 Bc5+ 29.Kf1 Qf5+ 30.Ke1 Qe5+
> 31.Qxe5 Bf2+ 32.Kxf2 (12.864.105) 426
>
>13/41 0:37 +0.68 19...Kxf6 20.Kh2 Rxg5 21.hxg5+ Ke7
> 22.dxe5 Qc5 23.Qf3 Qxe5+ 24.Kh1 Qf5
> 25.Qg3 e5 26.Rd1 Qf4 27.Qh3 Bc8
> 28.Rd7+ Bxd7 29.Qxd7+ Kxd7 30.Be8+ Rxe8 (16.593.244) 439
>
>14/44 0:58 +0.43-- 19...Kxf6 20.Kh1 c5 21.dxe5+ Kxe5
> 22.Qe1+ Kf6 23.Qxg3 Qd6 24.Qxd6 Bxd6 (25.765.815) 440
>
>14/44 1:14 -0.07-- 19...Kxf6 20.Kh1 c5 21.dxe5+ Kxe5
> 22.Qe1+ Kf6 23.Qxg3 Qd6 24.Qxd6 Bxg2+
> 25.Kxg2 Bg7 (32.178.326) 431
>
>14/47 2:34 -0.10 19...Kxf6 20.Kh1 Kg7 21.dxe5 Rxg5
> 22.hxg5 Qf2 23.Qd7+ Kh8 24.Qxe6 Qxb2
> 25.Rf1 Qxc3 26.Rxf8+ Rxf8 27.Qh6+ (69.382.871) 448
>
>14/47 2:52 -0.09++ 19...Rd3 20.Rxe6+ Kd7 21.Qe1 Qxd4+
> 22.Kh1 Bd6 23.Be2 Rh8 24.Nce4 Qxb2
> 25.Nxd6 Rxd6 26.Rxd6+ Kxd6 27.Qb4+ Qxb4
> 28.Nf7+ Nxf7 (77.574.556) 448
>
>14/47 3:11 -0.08 19...Rd3 20.Rxe6+ Kd7 21.Qe1 Qxd4+
> 22.Kh1 Bd6 23.Nce4 Be7 24.Rxe5 Qxe5
> 25.Nc5+ Qxc5 26.Bg4+ Ke8 27.Bh5+ Kd7
> 28.Bg4+ Ke8 29.Bh5+ Kd7 30.Bg4+ (85.685.853) 447
>
>15/45 4:08 -0.08 19...Rd3 20.Rxe6+ Kd7 21.Qe1 Qxd4+
> 22.Kh1 Bd6 23.Nce4 Be7 24.Rxe5 Qxe5
> 25.Nc5+ Qxc5 26.Bg4+ Ke8 27.Bh5+ Kd7
> 28.Bg4+ Ke8 29.Bh5+ Kd7 30.Bg4+ (109.494.318) 440
>
>best move: Rg3-d3 time: 4:42.747 min n/s: 434.047 CPU 97.7% n/s(1CPU):
>444.265 nodes: 122.725.554
>
>I can not comment on Gandalf, but I doubt the validity of playchess games!
>
>
>Nevertheless I am waiting for "my" UCI-Gandalf!
>
>Bye Ingo
>
>
>
>>[Event "60m + 15s, rated"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "2004.11.10"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Christian Gorals, Gandalf 6.0"]
>>[Black "La-Sirene, Shredder 8"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "D43"]
>>[WhiteElo "2661"]
>>[BlackElo "2603"]
>>[PlyCount "63"]
>>[EventDate "2004.02.17"]
>>
>>1. d4 {0.01/0 1} d5 {0} 2. c4 {0.01/0 0} c6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0.01/0 0} Nf6 {0} 4.
>>Nc3 {0.01/0 0} e6 {0} 5. Bg5 {0.01/0 0} h6 {0} 6. Bh4 {0.01/0 0} dxc4 {0} 7. e4
>>{0.01/0 0} g5 {0} 8. Bg3 {0.01/0 0} b5 {0} 9. Be2 {0.01/0 0} Bb7 {0} 10. h4 {
>>0.01/0 0} g4 {0} 11. Ne5 {0.01/0 0} h5 {0} 12. O-O {0.01/0 0} Nbd7 {0} 13. f3 {
>>0.01/0 0} gxf3 {-0.80/14 120} 14. Bxf3 {-0.12/14 302} Rg8 {-0.69/16 0} 15. Bxh5
>>{0.57/12 141} Rxg3 {-0.91/15 431} 16. Nxf7 {0.92/13 0} Qb6 {-0.91/15 109} 17.
>>Ng5+ {0.92/12 27} Ke7 {-0.91/15 232} 18. e5 {0.83/12 0} Nxe5 {-0.78/14 144} 19.
>>Rxf6 {0.86/12 195} Kxf6 {-0.90/14 248} 20. Kh2 {0.86/12 0} Rxg5 {-0.08/14 612}
>>21. hxg5+ {0.38/13 0} Kg7 {-0.01/15 126} 22. dxe5 {1.21/13 138} Qf2 {-0.01/15 6
>>} 23. Qg4 {1.15/14 203} Be7 {0.10/15 0} 24. Rd1 {1.40/14 120} Rd8 {0.67/14 18}
>>25. Ne4 {1.24/15 371} Qf5 {0.95/17 0} 26. Qxf5 {1.21/15 221} exf5 {1.38/19 0}
>>27. Nd6 {1.31/17 86} Bxg5 {1.38/18 0} 28. Nxb7 {1.28/16 78} Rh8 {1.64/17 454}
>>29. Rd7+ {1.92/16 87} Kf8 {1.62/18 114} 30. g4 {2.68/16 131} fxg4 {3.11/18 382}
>>31. Kg3 {3.45/18 0} Rxh5 {3.11/17 59} 32. Kxg4 {
>>La-Sirene,Shredder 8 gibt auf (Lag: Av=0.25s, max=0.5s) 4.00/17 10} 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.