Author: Harald Faber
Date: 12:37:59 11/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2004 at 14:14:39, Oreopoulos Kostas wrote: >[D] 1Q6/3b2pp/p1k1p3/8/4N3/Pp2b3/2q3PP/5R1K b - - 6 1 > >In that position it evalutates the position as won on both normal and gambit >styles. >Not better , but won. What do you call "won"? 00:00:00.0 -1,24 1 58 Qc2-d3 00:00:00.0 -1,08 2 385 Kc6-d5 00:00:00.0 -0,80 2 610 Kc6-d5 Qb8-b7+ Bd7-c6 00:00:00.0 -0,80 3 806 Kc6-d5 Qb8-b7+ Bd7-c6 00:00:00.0 -0,90 4 3044 Kc6-d5 Qb8-b7+ Bd7-c6 00:00:00.0 -0,80 5 7532 Kc6-d5 Qb8-d6+ Kd5xe4 Qd6xd7 Qc2-c4 00:00:00.0 -1,24 6 17003 Kc6-d5 Qb8-d6+ Kd5xe4 Qd6xd7 b3-b2 Qd7-b7+ Ke4-d4 Qb7xg7+ e6-e5 00:00:00.0 -0,68 6 30407 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 Kc6-d5 Ne4-g3 Bd7-c6 Qb8-d8+ Kd5-c4 00:00:00.1 -1,18 7 102455 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 a6-a5 Qb8-a8+ Kc6-b6 Qa8-d8+ Kb6-b7 Ne4-d6+ Qd3xd6 Re1xe3 00:00:00.4 -0,90 8 420931 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 a6-a5 Qb8-a8+ Kc6-b6 Qa8-d8+ Kb6-b7 Ne4-c3 Be3-b6 00:00:00.7 -1,28 9 703181 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 a6-a5 a3-a4 Kc6-d5 Ne4-g5 Qd3-c3 Re1-d1+ Be3-d4 00:00:02.3 -1,06 10 2318298 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 Kc6-d5 Qb8-b4 b3-b2 Ne4-c3+ Kd5-c6 Qb4xb2 Be3-d2 Re1-c1 Bd2xc1 Qb2xc1 00:00:04.0 -1,40 11 4156880 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 Kc6-d5 Ne4-f2 Qd3-c3 Re1-d1+ Be3-d4 Nf2-d3 a6-a5 Nd3-e5 Qc3-c2 00:00:11.7 -1,72 12 11917714 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 h7-h6 Qb8-e5 a6-a5 Qe5xa5 b3-b2 Qa5-b4 Qd3-d4 Qb4-b8 e6-e5 Qb8-a8+ Kc6-c7 00:00:25.0 -1,82 13 25629578 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 h7-h6 Qb8-e5 Kc6-b6 h2-h3 Bd7-b5 a3-a4 b3-b2 Qe5xb2 Qd3xe4 a4xb5 a6xb5 00:00:50.2 -1,64 14 52061635 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 Kc6-d5 Ne4-f2 Qd3-c3 Re1-d1+ Be3-d4 Nf2-d3 Bd7-b5 Qb8-a8+ Kd5-d6 Qa8-d8+ Bb5-d7 Nd3-b4 b3-b2 Nb4xa6 Qc3-e3 00:01:48.9 -1,86 15 113878605 Qc2-d3 Rf1-e1 Kc6-d5 Ne4-f2 Qd3-c3 Re1-d1+ Be3-d4 Nf2-d3 Bd7-b5 Qb8-a8+ Kd5-d6 Qa8-d8+ Bb5-d7 Nd3-e5 Kd6xe5 Qd8xd7 00:05:54.6 -1,72 15 370114822 Be3-c5 Ne4xc5 Kc6xc5 Qb8-a7+ Kc5-d6 Qa7-d4+ Kd6-c6 Qd4-a4+ Kc6-d6 00:07:47.3 -1,80 16 487660637 Be3-c5 Ne4xc5 Kc6xc5 Qb8-a7+ Kc5-d6 Qa7-d4+ Kd6-c6 Rf1-d1 Bd7-c8 Qd4-d3 Qc2xd3 Rd1xd3 e6-e5 00:30:38.1 -1,66 17 1953547759 Be3-c5 Ne4xc5 Kc6xc5 Qb8-f8+ Kc5-c6 Qf8-f3+ Kc6-d6 Rf1-d1+ Kd6-e7 Qf3-g4 Qc2-c3 Qg4-h4+ Ke7-e8 Qh4xh7 Bd7-b5 a3-a4 Bb5xa4 Is this what shows a won position? I say: Never >generally i think that there is a flaw in CT2004. It may find some tactics more >than CT15 but it over-underestimates positions. >Posibly needs to fine tune its engine. > >Its obvious for me, why its beeing crushed by shredder. Is it? For me it is not.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.