Author: Oreopoulos Kostas
Date: 13:47:23 11/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2004 at 15:37:59, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 10, 2004 at 14:14:39, Oreopoulos Kostas wrote: > >>[D] 1Q6/3b2pp/p1k1p3/8/4N3/Pp2b3/2q3PP/5R1K b - - 6 1 >> >>In that position it evalutates the position as won on both normal and gambit >>styles. >>Not better , but won. > > >00:30:38.1 -1,66 17 1953547759 Be3-c5 Ne4xc5 Kc6xc5 Qb8-f8+ Kc5-c6 Qf8-f3+ >Kc6-d6 Rf1-d1+ Kd6-e7 Qf3-g4 Qc2-c3 Qg4-h4+ Ke7-e8 Qh4xh7 Bd7-b5 a3-a4 Bb5xa4 > >Is this what shows a won position? I say: Never >Is it? For me it is not. Actually the score after both Qd3 or Kd5 should be 0.0 or close to zero. -1.66 is almost 2 pawns up. For me that is almost won. And of course it VERY BAD evaluation. How can you expect CT2004 to play well if he over-under estimates a position so much.? Dont you agree?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.