Author: Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz
Date: 15:39:05 11/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2004 at 17:45:33, Mike Byrne wrote: I might be wrong, but... the predicted sequence doesn't look right: 21-> 2:49 4.70 1. Kf1 Kd1 2. Kg1 Kc1 3. Kh2 Kd1 4. > Kh3 Ke1 5. Kh4 Kf1 6. Rg5 Ke2 7. Kh5 > Kd3 8. Kg6 Kxc3 9. Kh7 Rxg7+ 10. Kxg7 > Kb3 11. Rg6 c3 12. Rc6 c4 (s=5) This is the final position, and it doesn't seem to be worth 4.70: [d]8/6K1/2R5/8/2p5/1kp5/8/8 w - - 0 13 >I posted this earlier and there were no responses - perhaps the subject heading >was misleading: > >[d]6r1/33P1/8/2p5/2p5/2P5/6R1/2k1K3 w > >White(1): g >end-game phase > clearing hash tables > time surplus 56.59 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > time surplus 56.59 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > depth time score variation (1) > 11 0.13 1.72 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Kd2 > 11-> 0.17 1.72 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Kd2 > 12 0.27 1.64 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Kd2 Kc6 > 12-> 0.36 1.64 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Kd2 Kc6 > 13 0.72 1.72 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Kd2 Kc6 7. Ke3 > 13-> 0.88 1.72 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Kd2 Kc6 7. Ke3 > 14 1.58 1.72 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 > 14-> 1.94 1.72 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 > 15 3.08 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 8. Ke3 > 15-> 3.86 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 8. Ke3 > 16 5.72 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Ka5 8. Ke3 Kb5 > 16-> 7.17 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Ka5 8. Ke3 Kb5 > 17 10.41 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 8. Ke3 Re8+ 9. Kf4 Rg8 > 17-> 12.97 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 8. Ke3 Re8+ 9. Kf4 Rg8 > 18 18.21 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 8. Ke3 Ka4 9. Kf4 Kb3 > 18-> 23.22 1.80 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Kb5 8. Ke3 Ka4 9. Kf4 Kb3 > 19 33.58 1.92 1. Ke2 Kc2 2. Rg3 Kb2 3. Kd2 Kb3 4. > Kc1 Ka4 5. Kc2 Kb5 6. Rg6 Ka4 7. Kd2 > Rd8+ 8. Ke3 Rg8 9. Ke4 Kb3 10. Rg3 > <HT> > 19 46.82 +1 1. Kf1!! > 19 48.46 2.88 1. Kf1 Kd1 2. Kg1 Kc1 3. Kh2 Kd1 4. > Kh3 Ke1 5. Kh4 Kf1 6. Rg5 Ke2 7. Kh5 > Kd3 8. Kg6 Ra8 9. Kf7 Ra7+ 10. Kf8 > Ra8+ 11. Kf7 > 19-> 48.47 2.88 1. Kf1 Kd1 2. Kg1 Kc1 3. Kh2 Kd1 4. > Kh3 Ke1 5. Kh4 Kf1 6. Rg5 Ke2 7. Kh5 > Kd3 8. Kg6 Ra8 9. Kf7 Ra7+ 10. Kf8 > Ra8+ 11. Kf7 (s=7) > 20 51.94 +1 1. Kf1!! > 20 55.77 +3 1. Kf1!! > 20 1:02 4.94 1. Kf1 Kd1 2. Kg1 Kc1 3. Kh2 Kd1 4. > Kh3 Ke1 5. Kh4 Kf1 6. Rg5 Ke2 7. Kh5 > Kd3 8. Kg6 Kxc3 9. Kh7 Rxg7+ 10. Kxg7 > Kb3 11. Kf8 c3 12. Ke7 (s=6) > 20-> 1:27 4.94 1. Kf1 Kd1 2. Kg1 Kc1 3. Kh2 Kd1 4. > Kh3 Ke1 5. Kh4 Kf1 6. Rg5 Ke2 7. Kh5 > Kd3 8. Kg6 Kxc3 9. Kh7 Rxg7+ 10. Kxg7 > Kb3 11. Kf8 c3 12. Ke7 (s=5) > 21 1:41 4.70 1. Kf1 Kd1 2. Kg1 Kc1 3. Kh2 Kd1 4. > Kh3 Ke1 5. Kh4 Kf1 6. Rg5 Ke2 7. Kh5 > Kd3 8. Kg6 Kxc3 9. Kh7 Rxg7+ 10. Kxg7 > Kb3 11. Rg6 c3 12. Rc6 c4 (s=4) > 21-> 2:49 4.70 1. Kf1 Kd1 2. Kg1 Kc1 3. Kh2 Kd1 4. > Kh3 Ke1 5. Kh4 Kf1 6. Rg5 Ke2 7. Kh5 > Kd3 8. Kg6 Kxc3 9. Kh7 Rxg7+ 10. Kxg7 > Kb3 11. Rg6 c3 12. Rc6 c4 (s=5) > time=3:00 cpu=186% mat=0 n=261465612 fh=95% nps=1.45M > ext-> chk=15867804 cap=122528 pp=16703675 1rep=171681 mate=35220 > predicted=0 nodes=261465612 evals=31315547 50move=0 > endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0 > SMP-> split=12451 stop=798 data=8/128 cpu=5:36 elap=3:00
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.