Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: test position

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 17:25:03 11/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 2004 at 19:01:20, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>[d]6r1/33P1/8/2p5/2p5/2P5/6R1/2k1K3 w
>
>Crafty's line is definitely =.  Zappa without tables tries for the same line,
>with them it doesn't.
>
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-f1 Kd1-c1 7. Kf1-g1 Kc1-d1
> = (2.93)	Depth: 21/28	00:00:09.37	19204kN (2048 KN/s, 1630 splits, 31 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-f1 Kd1-c1 7. Kf1-e1 Rg8-c8 8. g7-g8=Q Rc8xg8 9. Rg2xg8 Kc1-c2 10.
>Rg8-g7 Kc2-b3 11. Ke1-d2 Kb3-b2
> = (2.93)	Depth: 22/28	00:00:09.83	19758kN (2010 KN/s, 1691 splits, 31 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-f1 Kd1-c1 7. Kf1-e1 Rg8-c8 8. g7-g8=Q Rc8xg8 9. Rg2xg8 Kc1-c2 10.
>Rg8-g7 Kc2-b3 11. Ke1-d2 Kb3-b2 12. Rg7-g8 Kb2-a3 13. Rg8-g5 Ka3-b3 14. Rg5xc5
> = (2.93)	Depth: 22/28	00:00:10.78	21071kN (1954 KN/s, 1822 splits, 35 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1++
> + (3.23)	Depth: 23/30	00:00:16.48	33605kN (2039 KN/s, 1893 splits, 37 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h3 Kf1-e1 5. Kh3-h4
>Ke1-f1 6. Rg2-g5 Kf1-e2 7. Kh4-h5 Ke2-d2 8. Rg5-g3 Rg8xg7 9. Rg3xg7 Kd2xc3 10.
>Kh5-g4 Kc3-b2 11. Rg7-b7 Kb2-c2 12. Rb7-c7 c4-c3 13. Rc7xc5 Kc2-c1 14. Rc5xc3
>Kc1-b2
> = (3.87)	Depth: 23/31	00:01:10.28	169669kN (2414 KN/s, 2007 splits, 42 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h3 Kf1-e1 5. Kh3-h4
>Ke1-f1 6. Rg2-g5 Kf1-e2 7. Kh4-h5 Ke2-d2 8. Rg5-g3 Rg8xg7 9. Rg3xg7 Kd2xc3 10.
>Kh5-g4 Kc3-b2 11. Rg7-b7 Kb2-c2 12. Rb7-c7 c4-c3 13. Rc7xc5 Kc2-b3
> = (3.87)	Depth: 23/31	00:01:21.05	192758kN (2378 KN/s, 2422 splits, 69 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1--
> - (3.57)	Depth: 24/31	00:01:24.90	204250kN (2406 KN/s, 2480 splits, 72 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h3 Kf1-e1 5. Kh3-h4
>Ke1-f1 6. Rg2-g5 Kf1-e2 7. Rg5-g3 Ke2-f2 8. Kh4-h5 Kf2xg3 9. Kh5-g6 Kg3-g2 10.
>Kg6-h6 Kg2-f2 11. Kh6-g6 Kf2-e3 12. Kg6-f6 Rg8-e8 13. g7-g8=Q Ke3-e2
> = (2.96)	Depth: 24/31	00:01:33.48	228485kN (2444 KN/s, 2623 splits, 81 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h3 Kf1-e1 5. Kh3-h4
>Ke1-f1 6. Rg2-g5 Kf1-e2 7. Rg5-g3 Ke2-f2 8. Kh4-h5 Kf2xg3 9. Kh5-g6 Kg3-g2 10.
>Kg6-h6 Kg2-f2 11. Kh6-g6 Kf2-e3 12. Kg6-f6 Rg8-e8 13. g7-g8=Q Ke3-e2
> = (2.96)	Depth: 24/31	00:01:39.49	242551kN (2438 KN/s, 2990 splits, 95 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h3 Kf1-e1 5. Kh3-h4
>Ke1-f1 6. Rg2-g5 Kf1-e2 7. Rg5-g4 Ke2-e1 8. Rg4-g3 Ke1-f2 9. Kh4-h5 Kf2xg3 10.
>Kh5-g6 Kg3-g2 11. Kg6-h6 Kg2-f2 12. Kh6-g6 Kf2-e3 13. Kg6-f7 Rg8-d8 14. g7-g8=Q
>Ke3-f4
> = (2.96)	Depth: 25/32	00:01:41.11	245281kN (2426 KN/s, 3118 splits, 102 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h3 Kf1-e1 5. Kh3-h4
>Ke1-f1 6. Rg2-g5 Kf1-e2 7. Rg5-g4 Ke2-e1 8. Rg4-g3 Ke1-f2 9. Kh4-h5 Kf2xg3 10.
>Kh5-g6 Kg3-g2 11. Kg6-h6 Kg2-f2 12. Kh6-g6
> = (2.96)	Depth: 25/32	00:01:45.54	253343kN (2400 KN/s, 3372 splits, 107 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1++
> + (3.26)	Depth: 26/33	00:02:40.63	385113kN (2397 KN/s, 3525 splits, 120 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-h2 Kd1-e1 7. Kh2-g1
> = (3.25)	Depth: 26/33	00:02:59.31	425168kN (2371 KN/s, 3714 splits, 130 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-h2 Kd1-e1 7. Kh2-g1
> = (3.25)	Depth: 26/33	00:03:12.54	449352kN (2334 KN/s, 4131 splits, 156 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-h2 Kd1-e1 7. Kh2-g1
> = (3.25)	Depth: 27/35	00:03:25.38	476997kN (2322 KN/s, 4285 splits, 161 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-h2 Kd1-e1 7. Kh2-g1
> = (3.25)	Depth: 27/36	00:03:41.39	510985kN (2308 KN/s, 4623 splits, 175 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-f1 Kd1-c1 7. Kf1-g1 Kc1-d1
> = (3.25)	Depth: 28/36	00:04:06.25	565601kN (2297 KN/s, 4805 splits, 182 aborts)
>1. Ke1-f1 Kc1-d1 2. Kf1-g1 Kd1-e1 3. Kg1-h2 Ke1-f1 4. Kh2-h1 Kf1-e1 5. Kh1-g1
>Ke1-d1 6. Kg1-f1 Kd1-c1 7. Kf1-g1 Kc1-d1
> = (3.25)	Depth: 28/36	00:04:37.88	632930kN (2278 KN/s, 5253 splits, 210 aborts)
>
>
>You can see it flirts with the idea, then realizes it draws.  Of course its
>selected line is no better . . .
>
>anthony

I do not understand why it does not evaluate repetition as a draw.
It writes
6. Kg1-f1 Kd1-c1 7. Kf1-g1 Kc1-d1

Even I can see that it is repetition.
Cannot zappa see that it is repetition and return 0.00  from that line?

Note that the first 6 moves are correct but 7.Ke1 is the right move later and
not 7.Kg1

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.