Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: my mistake ...

Author: Mike Byrne

Date: 19:27:00 11/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 2004 at 22:24:04, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 12, 2004 at 22:08:18, Mike Byrne wrote:
>
>>On November 12, 2004 at 22:04:34, Mike Byrne wrote:
>>
>>>sel 0 0 , ext set to 0
>>>
>>>sd=1
>>>
>>>Black(1): new
>>>White(1): g
>>>              time surplus   0.00  time limit 22.50 (3:30)
>>>              depth   time  score   variation (1)
>>>                1     0.00   0.16   1. Nf3
>>>                1->   0.01   0.16   1. Nf3
>>>              time=0.01  cpu=0%  mat=0  n=60  fh=100%  nps=10K
>>>              ext-> chk=0 cap=0 pp=0 1rep=0 mate=0
>>>              predicted=0  nodes=60  evals=20  50move=0
>>>              endgame tablebase-> probes=0  hits=0
>>>              SMP->  split=0  stop=0  data=0/128  cpu=0.00  elap=0.01
>>>
>>>White(1): Nf3
>>>              time used:   0.01
>>>
>>>-> why 60 nodes here?
>>>
>>>( thought it would be 20)
>>>
>>>same settings, sd=2
>>>
>>>Black(1): new
>>>White(1): sd 2
>>>search depth set to 2.
>>>White(1): g
>>>              time surplus   0.00  time limit 22.50 (3:30)
>>>              depth   time  score   variation (1)
>>>                1     0.00   0.16   1. Nf3
>>>                1->   0.02   0.16   1. Nf3
>>>                2     0.02  -0.14   1. Nf3 Nc6
>>>                2->   0.02  -0.14   1. Nf3 Nc6
>>>              time=0.02  cpu=0%  mat=0  n=119  fh=100%  nps=10K
>>>              ext-> chk=0 cap=0 pp=0 1rep=0 mate=0
>>>              predicted=0  nodes=119  evals=59  50move=0
>>>              endgame tablebase-> probes=0  hits=0
>>>              SMP->  split=0  stop=0  data=0/128  cpu=0.00  elap=0.02
>>>
>>>White(1): Nf3
>>>              time used:   0.02
>>>Black(1):
>>>
>>>-> why 119 nodes here
>>>
>>>I thought it would be 400.
>>>
>>>There are no extensions, null move is off.
>>>
>>>An insights appreciated.  I may be misunderstanding what is "supposed" o be
>>>counted.
>>
>>I just remembered Crafty's perft command
>>
>>Black(1): perft 2
>>total moves=440  time=0.00
>>Black(1): perft 1
>>total moves=20  time=0.00
>>Black(1):
>>
>> I don;t understand the 440 either - but I must be missing something.
>
>Are you sure that it use the opening position?
>Maybe it use the position after Nc3.
>
>I remember that Crafty calculated perft correctly some years ago.
>
>Uri


was not at sttarting position

just ran it from start and from a known position

start:

White(1): new
White(1): perft 1
total moves=20  time=0.00
White(1): perft 2
total moves=400  time=0.00
White(1): perft 3
total moves=8902  time=0.00
White(1): perft 4
total moves=197281  time=0.08
White(1): perft 6
total moves=119060324  time=47.22

Aok


known position:

Black(1): r3k2r/p1ppqpb1/bn2pnp1/3PN3/1p2P3/2N2Q1p/PPPBBPPP/R3K2R w KQkq -
White(1): perft 1
total moves=48  time=0.00
White(1): perft 2
total moves=2039  time=0.00
White(1): perft 3
total moves=97862  time=0.03
White(1): perft 4
total moves=4085603  time=1.51
White(1): perft 5
total moves=193690690  time=69.22

Aok




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.