Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Final CM9000 settings standings v the top programs.

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 13:57:03 11/13/04

Go up one level in this thread


On November 13, 2004 at 16:40:33, Albert Silver wrote:

>On November 13, 2004 at 15:36:53, Graham Banks wrote:
>
>>Dual Athlon 2800
>>256 mb hash each
>>3,4,5 EGTB's
>>Ponder on
>>No learning
>>Deep Fritz 8 GUI
>>All using powerbook with optimised settings
>>
>>40 game matches at 40 moves in 40 minutes repeating against all of Shredder 8,
>>Deep Junior 8, Deep Fritz 8, Hiarcs 9 and Chess Tiger 15.
>
>Note that Deep Junior 8 is weaker than Junior 8 on a single CPU. At least
>according to the SSDF list.
>
>                                       Albert
>
Hi Albert,

Deep Junior 8 is doing just ine in my Super Tournament III Final at 40 moves in
2 hrs repeating on a single cpu.
However I've found it doesn't fare as well at shorter time controls.

Graham.
>
>>
>>100.5 - Assassin
>>100.0 - R1
>>96.5  - Judge II
>>93.0  - TO5
>>83.0  - Alliance
>>
>>
>>Ray will now pit top CM10th settings (Creep, R1, Milan 1.4, Schumacher) against
>>the aforementioned programs.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.