Author: Norm Pollock
Date: 05:41:05 11/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2004 at 03:16:30, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On November 16, 2004 at 02:48:55, Petr Dobes wrote: > >>Does someone know, what are the differences between Shredder 8 and Shredder >>Classic 1.0 / 1.1 / engines, what engine is stronger? >> >> Thanks Peter > >Peter, > >Only Shredder 8 CB (running under ChessBase GUI) has been tested and you can see >the SSDF rating below. > >Shredder 8 UCI (running under Shredder Classic interface) with the latest >Shredder8a.bkt has not been tested, but according to my personal tests it should >be about 25 points stronger than Shredder 8 CB. > >Shredder Classic 1.0 and 1.1 are WEAKER engines. The are weaker between 100 to >150 points, but they offer some more options than Shredder 8 UCI, like showing >the available move after the opponent reply listed according the the given score >by the evaluation and more - see www.shredderchess.com/ for details. > >Sandro > > > THE SSDF RATING LIST 2004-04-22 97872 games played by 264 computers > Rating + - Games Won Oppo > ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- > 1 Shredder 8.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2818 34 -32 481 70% 2673 > 2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2809 24 -23 967 71% 2648 > 3 Deep Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2790 26 -25 855 72% 2625 > 4 Junior 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2782 27 -26 750 67% 2654 > 5 Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2772 27 -25 801 70% 2624 > 6 Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2769 24 -24 898 66% 2655 > 7 Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2759 22 -22 1043 65% 2649 > 8 Deep Junior 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2749 35 -33 439 64% 2644 > 9 Hiarcs 9.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2747 26 -26 744 61% 2667 > 10 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2744 29 -28 634 63% 2653 > 11 Shredder 6.0 Pad UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 2725 22 -22 1033 62% 2642 > 12 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2723 31 -30 547 62% 2634 > 13 Chessmaster 9000 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2720 36 -36 376 55% 2682 > 14 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2719 30 -30 557 61% 2640 > 14 Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2719 23 -22 983 58% 2659 > 16 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2718 30 -29 571 61% 2642 > 17 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2715 29 -29 583 58% 2656 > 18 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2702 24 -23 881 54% 2674 > 19 Shredder 7.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2699 34 -34 429 54% 2669 > 20 Rebel 12.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2691 34 -33 442 56% 2647 > 21 Hiarcs 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2684 22 -22 996 53% 2663 > 22 Ruffian 1.0.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2679 29 -29 565 53% 2658 > 23 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2677 29 -29 590 60% 2606 > 24 Deep Sjeng 1.5a 256MB Athlon 1200 MH 2676 31 -31 493 52% 2664 > 25 Chess Tiger 15.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2666 34 -33 433 52% 2651 > 26 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2663 26 -26 739 50% 2661 I use Shredder8 uci under Fritz8 gui. Is there any difference compared to using Shredder8 CB under Fritz8 gui?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.