Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:34:02 11/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2004 at 21:08:19, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 16, 2004 at 20:37:09, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >>Being a proud owner of Chess Tiger 14, it pains me to observe posting results >>here of Tiger 2004. It seems after a long pause since Tiger 15 that Tiger 2004 >>is not performing, so far, as well as I would have hoped. >>I passed on buying Tiger 15 waiting for Tiger 16 (2004 , guess) and now I dont >>expect to buy this version of Tiger for the present time being. >>Very sad 4 me because Gambit tiger was/is a fun engine... >>With respect and not wishing to harm Christopher. > >From the sound of it, it is a complete redesign. >I have ordered a copy (which comes with Chess Assistant 8). >I expect to watch how it plays, to see how much I enjoy it. > >I expect big things from Christophe. He has a much faster NPS now, and so he >has more slack to play with than before. I think that nodes per second are irrelevant here. Being twice faster is not more than 50 elo at the ssdf time control and the gap between shredder and tiger is clearly bigger. This is an engine that may challenge >Shredder before long. Sometimes, a step sizeways (or even backwards) is >necessary before we can take a big step forwards. I do not expect it to challenge shredder. It may be better than shredder8 after enough time but shredder also gets better. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.