Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 08:18:14 11/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2004 at 08:24:34, Steve B wrote: >> >>Even if I gave you the "legal" arugument - It also my view that posts that >>promote cheating are "abusive" in nature and thus violate point # 2 above. >>Cheating is a form of abuse. Please - don't go down that "ethical cheating" >>path - we heard that one before and it sank like a lead ballon. >> >>If you disagree - feel free to run as Moderator. > >actually Mike this clown unwittingly stumbles upon a good point >why not have a small ammendment to the current charter,specifically banning all >postings encouraging internet chess computer cheating? >this would save you and the other moderators alot of wasted time and energy >having to answer/respond to endless threads every few months or so,whenever one >of these creeps rear's their ugly heads >perhaps the membership could vote on the ban with the next moderator elections? >i am sure the membership would overwhelminlgy approve of the ammendment >lets close the "loophole" these slime buckets are greasing their way through to >post here >an example of the ammendment: > >2) Are not abusive in nature(including advocating cheating on a chess server) >or something similar > >i leave the exact wording to those better at constitutional law writing then me >:) > >your thoughts? >Best >Steve In my opinion there is no loophole. Messages that are abusive in nature are just not allowed. These will be deleted, earn warning points and eventually can get you banned. And the last step will only be taken when all three moderators agree on it. Fortunately, in most cases it is not necessary to take that step. Richard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.