Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 03:46:33 11/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2004 at 06:41:22, Tony Petters wrote: >On November 17, 2004 at 22:15:42, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On November 17, 2004 at 21:12:24, Tony Petters wrote: >> >>>On November 17, 2004 at 10:21:11, Fernando Villegas wrote: >>> >>>>In the page of his, Bruce say clearly he is waiting the adequate commercial deal >>>>OR becoming so poor he should need to get money with ferret. So there are not >>>>freeware plans for Ferret. >>>>Fernando >>> >>>Ferret is not strong enough to become commercial it is a freebie winboard engine >>>at best. >>> >>>Cordially >> >>I presume your comment has some substance to justify it as opposed to being the >>troll it appears to be. >> >> Albert > >As I recall it did poorly in a tournament a few years back and was never seen in >tourney play again. Unless, it can be proven to play at the same level as the >top programs, it will always remain in the public view where it is now. > >Cordially You need to do some research before you post crap like this here. Ferret is well respected amongst those who know. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.