Author: Steve B
Date: 12:43:41 11/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
>An ammendment to the charter would be a >positive step forward towards resolving conflicts and potential future problems >on this issue, but as I already pointed out, it wouldn't be perfect and it would >only be one step. i would be perfect and the only step required no need for retro- active ammendments "going forward" is just fine your changing the rules argument is without logic rules are changed all the time "going forward" they do it in professinal sports..in business(income tax laws)..etc.etc changing the rules while a game is in progress is of course nonsense and not suggessted at all here it is a moot point however the moderators have decided that their is no need for an ammendment and so the issue has been dropped. Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.