Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Super Tournament III Final at 40/2hrs (Round 30 of 44 completed)

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 14:42:05 11/18/04

Go up one level in this thread


On November 18, 2004 at 14:41:58, Chris Taylor wrote:

>On November 18, 2004 at 12:46:28, Graham Banks wrote:
>
>>Athlon XP1900+
>>128mb hash or closest allowed for each engine
>>3,4,5 men tablebases
>>Ponder off
>>No learning
>>Engines using own books where able
>>List 512 using general.ctg
>>CM9000 Alliance using CM8000 book (manually converted)
>>CM10th Creep using powerbook with optimised settings
>>44 rounds at 40 moves in 120 minutes repeating
>>
>>
>>
>>Standings after Round 30 of 44
>>
>>21.5	- Shredder 8
>>20.5	- Deep Junior 8
>>16.5	- CM9000 Alliance
>>16.0	- CM10th Creep
>>15.0	- Pharaon 3.00b
>>15.0	- Deep Fritz 8
>>14.0	- Chess Tiger 15
>>14.0	- List 512
>>13.5	- Ruffian 2.1.0
>>12.5	- Hiarcs 9
>>11.0	- Pro Deo 1.0
>>10.5	- Aristarch 4.50
>>
>>
>>Games (Rounds 1-29) are for available for download through the following link:
>>http://www.utzingerk.com/banks/st_03_final.htm
>>Round 30 games will be available soon.
>>
>>Comments welcome as always,
>>Graham.
>
>Have you tried CM9000 R1?
>
>I am doing some auto232 tests with this variant, and it seems quite an
>intersting setting.  I am testing on 3' + 2" and then on game in 40'.  I have it
>running in Chessbase.gui......
>
>I have been following these posts and enjoy reading them!
>
>Chris


Hi Chris,

at present I regard the following CM9000 settings to be the strongest (in no
particular order):   R1, Assassin, TO5, Judge II and Alliance.
R1 seems to perform consistently well on slower and faster machines over the
full range of time controls. Taking this into account, it could very well be the
best setting of the lot.
If you're following the testing carried out by my brother Ray, you'll see that
Assassin and R1 are outperforming the others. In Ray's tournament at 40/2hrs,
Assassin is leading against the top engines at this stage.
My belief though is that there is realistically very little difference in
strength between these top settings, so you're likely to get exceptional results
now and then from all of them.

Regards, Graham.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.