Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 08:22:43 11/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2004 at 11:05:18, David Dahlem wrote: > >I made my point, that +1.23 is not a draw score, and i stand by that. I'm not >going to argue with you. If you speak from an engine's point of view, then YES it's not a draw score, meaning that the engine don't understand the position as a draw. If you speak from a human's point of view, then NO it is probably a draw score, meaning that the human can conclude things from the derivative of the function(fail low/high) that the function points(score) themselves don't show. It is not a draw score for the engine, but we have to translate it in this way. Looking the score and the changing tendency of the score(some function points and it's derivative), we can conclude more things than looking only the score. So our "predictions" about the position according to engine's evaluation are better........
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.