Author: Rajen Gupta
Date: 15:41:20 01/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
Cm 6000 is not by any stretch of imagination the ''best'' programme although it might well be the strongest. I would put my money on CM 6000 against perhaps every other programm barring F5/32 and J5. It would most definitely thrash the daylights from H7 or chess tiger11.7. Rajen gupta On January 16, 1999 at 18:26:05, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Hiarcs 7.0 and Chess Tiger 11.7 are better than CM6000. For the price though >CM6000 can't be beat. Like I have said before, todays programs are weak >compared to what we will have in five to ten years. CM6000 is a pain to use for >analysis and the CD residency requirement makes it very irritating. Mindscape, >the distributor of CM6000, has a very poor support department with regards to >chess. Given a choice between paying $29.00 US for CM6000 and $59.00 US for >Hiarcs 7.0, I would spend more for the better program. I already have Hiarcs 6 >also for DOS and find that very good and much easier to use for analysis. > >I would think that an Aussie like yourself would like a program by a proper >Englishman (Mark Uniacke). Rule Brittania!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.