Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is this legal?

Author: Laurens Winkelhagen

Date: 02:28:41 11/22/04

Go up one level in this thread


On November 22, 2004 at 05:23:57, Laurens Winkelhagen wrote:

>On November 21, 2004 at 23:48:34, Peter Darin wrote:
>
>>
>>IMO In the position black can mate and it is a mating material because of the
>>White pawns which can obstruct the white king and white can be mated.
>>
>>If a game is Knight vs Knight or Bishops vs Bishops (with no pawns) it is a draw
>>due to insufficient material.
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Peter
>
>By that reasoning even KNvKN and KBvKB are not cases of insufficient mating
>material. In both cases the one piece can obstruct it's king so that the
>opponents piece can mate. Earlier in this thread we already saw an example of
>KBvKB. KNvKN is similar of course. (hmm lets try some FEN of the top of my head,
>forgive me when this diagram fails)
> [D] kn6/2N5/1K6/8/8/8/8/8 - - 1 0

retry:

[D] kn6/2N5/1K6/8/8/8/8/8 b - - 0 1

>
>Regards, Laurens.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.