Author: Günther Simon
Date: 03:10:42 11/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2004 at 03:20:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 27, 2004 at 00:06:43, Peter Darin wrote: > >>ya but do u think u can get fair result by using Slowchess Book which is not >>that good. Instead using differant book might help give u the correct picture of >>Engine's Strength. >> >>Regards >> >>Peter > >You can get totally fair result. >books is part of the package that you test. > >I also think that books are overestimated and the proof is >List that comes with no book > >Tests when List used the nunn positions(no book for both sides) showed the >following results: > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ratingnunn0309.txt >see http://freehosting.hostrave.com/p/iggor/nil/NIL7_rat.txt > >I know that a lot of varaibles are different(not same time control not same >opponents but it still seems that if there is no problem of losing the same >opening again and again books are not very important). > >Uri But the Nunn positions _are_ like a book. You cannot say both using Nunn positions is like both using no book! That's completely wrong. Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.