Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 08:23:24 11/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2004 at 11:11:01, Peter Skinner wrote: >I have read many posts where some are using the native engine from the >Chesspartner interface, some are using the UCI engine, but no one has yet to try >the Winboard version of Gandalf 6.0. > >Which is the preferred engine to use? I would assume the native engine from an >advertising stand point and the UCI for actual results? > >Peter I think it depends on the user. There is a large following of Winboard users who convert UCI engines to Winboard. I suspect they would use the winboard engine. I suspect there would be no difference in the positional computation. Best, Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.