Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 08:25:37 11/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2004 at 11:16:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On November 27, 2004 at 11:11:01, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>I have read many posts where some are using the native engine from the >>Chesspartner interface, some are using the UCI engine, but no one has yet to try >>the Winboard version of Gandalf 6.0. >> >>Which is the preferred engine to use? I would assume the native engine from an >>advertising stand point and the UCI for actual results? >> >>Peter > > > Hi Peter > Do you expect small/big differences between > these engines? > Kurt Well in fact yes. Some are reporting huge wins using the UCI engine in the Chessbase interface, and others are reporting losses vs the same engines using the native version. So it is a bit confusing. If the engines are in fact identical, the interface should not matter. It is just a question. Nothing really to it other than information seeking. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.