Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 08:35:52 11/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2004 at 11:25:37, Peter Skinner wrote:
>On November 27, 2004 at 11:16:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On November 27, 2004 at 11:11:01, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>
>>>I have read many posts where some are using the native engine from the
>>>Chesspartner interface, some are using the UCI engine, but no one has yet to try
>>>the Winboard version of Gandalf 6.0.
>>>
>>>Which is the preferred engine to use? I would assume the native engine from an
>>>advertising stand point and the UCI for actual results?
>>>
>>>Peter
>>
>>
>> Hi Peter
>> Do you expect small/big differences between
>> these engines?
>> Kurt
>
>Well in fact yes.
>
>Some are reporting huge wins using the UCI engine in the Chessbase interface,
>and others are reporting losses vs the same engines using the native version.
>
>So it is a bit confusing. If the engines are in fact identical, the interface
>should not matter.
>
>It is just a question. Nothing really to it other than information seeking.
>
>Peter
Are such differences not merely due to
the less number of games played?
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.