Author: Chessfun
Date: 08:41:24 11/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2004 at 11:14:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On November 27, 2004 at 10:03:49, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 27, 2004 at 04:19:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On November 27, 2004 at 03:33:59, George Sobala wrote: >>> >>>>Gandalf 6 v Shredder 8 >>>> >>>>Classical time control: 40/120' + 20/60' +game/60' >>>>Shredder Classic GUI >>>>Both engines 64M hash, pondering off >>>>Books: Shredder using shredder8a.bkt, Gandalf using own book >>>>3,4 and some 5 man TBs >>>>Centrino 1.6GHz, Windows XP SP2 >>>> >>>>G6 00½½½½½½0½ 3 >>>>S8 11½½½½½½1½ 7 >>>> >>>>last 5 games PGN will follow >>>> >>>>match continues ... >>> >>> It will be interesting to see the result >>> of this match after 30-50 games -:) Keep >>> up your work. >>> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] >> >>I tried this match as well same settings. Both programs get to 99.9% hash used >>in under a minute. IMO It's a waste of time, maximum with this hash setting >>should be probably 30 mins game. >> >>Sarah. > > Hi Sarah > Do you really think that more hash would > make a sensible influence on the outcome > of this match. I very much doubt. A result > of 3-7 can happen, the next serie may be > 6-4 for G60 (I hope) > Kind regards > Kurt I think it can from watching the engines in the game I ran. It seems to me that if the engine is at 100% hash then we don't really have a 40/120' + 20/60' game/60' time control. And if we believe that engines perform differently at different controls then we have a match that is in fact only 30 mins game. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.