Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 09:50:48 11/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2004 at 11:23:24, Mike Byrne wrote: >On November 27, 2004 at 11:11:01, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>I have read many posts where some are using the native engine from the >>Chesspartner interface, some are using the UCI engine, but no one has yet to try >>the Winboard version of Gandalf 6.0. >> >>Which is the preferred engine to use? I would assume the native engine from an >>advertising stand point and the UCI for actual results? >> >>Peter > >I think it depends on the user. There is a large following of Winboard users >who convert UCI engines to Winboard. I suspect they would use the winboard >engine. I suspect there would be no difference in the positional computation. > >Best, > >Michael Actually Gandalf has always been a Winboard engine as well if I am not mistaken. I believe it only requires an "xboard" entry on the commandline. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.