Author: Rex
Date: 09:12:31 11/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2004 at 11:39:19, Peter Skinner wrote: >On November 29, 2004 at 11:09:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>You did not test Gandalf5 in the same machine so it does not contradict the >>claim that Gandalf6 is 100 elo better than gandalf5. >> >>Maybe Gandalf does not like your P4 and Gandalf5 will even fail more in your >>machine and will be 100 elo weaker. >> >>It may be interesting to know the number of nodes per second that gandalf and >>hiarcs get in your machine and compare with people with faster machines. >> >>Another possibility is that gandalf does not like fischer time control and is >>relatively better at x minutes/40 moves. >> >>Uri > >Or another possibliity is that the advertising is purely hype like I figured.... > >Fool me once, shame on you.. fool me twice.. shame on me. > >In a way I am happy that it only cost me $50 to not believe _any_ advertising >from the Lokasoft group of engines. And as reported more than once here, and on >the Lokasoft forums there is a problem with the ChessPartner interface and >UCI/Native engines with online play. The interface is not updating the board >during games and the engine is losing on time. This was first reported with >Rebel 12, and has only continued. > >From now on I am sticking to my good ole trusty Winboard, and the Chessbase >interface. Neither have let me down yet. > >Peter Look at Lokasofts web site for some updates. I am running CP5.EXE 5.3.0.44 with really good results.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.