Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 09:19:15 11/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2004 at 11:51:35, Roger Brown wrote: >Hello Peter, > >Not to seem dense but speaking as a Winboard fan myself, why did you not use >that interface to conduct your on-line match? I specifically asked Steen if one interface was recommended over the other. I was told it did not matter. So I didn't think it would matter. >Also, are you satisfied that your test match is sufficient to conclude one way >or the other? Obviously not regarding the strength. There are just two few of games. I know this, but when it can't win one game in ten, it doesn't really look encouraging to continue and waste my time. >Ps. I like the work you have been doing on your site. All those files so >easily accessible to my grasping fingers. Much appreciated. > >Later. Thank you for the input. I try to make it very easy to navigate, and for users to find what they are looking for quickly. That is the main reason I created the new page for Crafty SE/Classic. So many people download those files so I wanted to make as easy as possible for them to be found. I am also putting up some new pages today explaining how to use the winboard232d.exe adapter correctly as I get so many emails asking, and I am finally finished my review of all the interfaces that Crafty can be used in. After revising the text of it many times so that it doesn't sound like I am bashing one interface over another, it now simply shows the pro's and con's, and which I feel is the best out there. I will give you $20 if you guess which one it is :) Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.