Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Has SSDF become complacent?

Author: John Rice

Date: 01:49:43 12/01/04

Only one list per year is lacking, at best. Not to mention the ridiculously
dated 1200 MHz hardware being used. Honestly, isn't it time for an organization
with some vision and enthusiasm to step up and take the helm?

• Re: Has SSDF become complacent? Roger D Davis 13:06:30 12/01/04
• SSDF need our encouragement and thanks! Graham Banks 10:08:06 12/01/04
  • Re: SSDF need our encouragement and thanks! gerold daniels 16:11:27 12/01/04
• Re: Has SSDF become complacent? Peter Skinner 09:23:19 12/01/04
  • Re: Has SSDF become complacent? Lance Perkins 11:05:29 12/01/04
    • Re: Has SSDF become complacent? José Carlos 11:39:04 12/01/04
      • Re: Has SSDF become complacent? Lance Perkins 13:19:19 12/01/04
• Re: Has SSDF become complacent? Albert Silver 04:53:18 12/01/04
  • Even better than my reply!! NT Chris Taylor 06:15:10 12/01/04
• Re: Has SSDF become complacent? Chris Taylor 02:32:23 12/01/04
  • Re: Has SSDF become complacent? John Rice 02:45:51 12/01/04
    • Re: Has SSDF become complacent? Chris Taylor 06:31:28 12/01/04
    • Re: Has SSDF become complacent? James T. Walker 05:33:36 12/01/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.