Author: Jason Kent
Date: 11:52:09 12/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2004 at 14:34:11, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On December 01, 2004 at 14:03:43, Jason Kent wrote: > >>For a while I've been testing Chessmaster 9000 settings, and I think I've >>finally created a great setting. It seems do phenomenal in all time controls. >>It is able to hold its own vs Shredder 8 at long time controls and does even >>better in fast games. >> >>I have a website below with different CM9 and 10thEd settings and more info >>about CM9 Slayer. >>http://www.freewebs.com/jkplayschess/ >> >>Slayer Text Setting >>opp=100 opn=100 opb=103 opr=102 opq=103 myp=100 myn=100 myb=103 myr=102 myq=104 >>cc=100 mob=110 ks=155 pp=110 pw=110 avd=-2 sel=12 >> >>Have fun, >> >>Jason :) > > > Hi Jason > Do you really think that your conclusion > based on 191 games at 10m/g vs Shredder 8 > and (unfortunately) only 27 games at 80m/g > vs Shredder 8 may be right. For me: much > to less games played, none vs other engines > at slow time control. The good result of > CM9_Slayer at blitz may however encourage > other chesfriends to give your setting a trial. > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] I've actually had played 100+ games at 40m/g against the top freeware engines and Slayer won by a large margin. I seem to have lost the pgn and so I didn't post anything about it on my website. I've also extensively tested this setting through several beta settings that did pretty well and progressively got better as i fine tuned settings. This setting has also done very well on FICS and seems to be playing a better game, and has increased my rating in all of the time controls. Jason
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.