Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:57:22 12/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2004 at 14:52:09, Jason Kent wrote:
>On December 01, 2004 at 14:34:11, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On December 01, 2004 at 14:03:43, Jason Kent wrote:
>>
>>>For a while I've been testing Chessmaster 9000 settings, and I think I've
>>>finally created a great setting. It seems do phenomenal in all time controls.
>>>It is able to hold its own vs Shredder 8 at long time controls and does even
>>>better in fast games.
>>>
>>>I have a website below with different CM9 and 10thEd settings and more info
>>>about CM9 Slayer.
>>>http://www.freewebs.com/jkplayschess/
>>>
>>>Slayer Text Setting
>>>opp=100 opn=100 opb=103 opr=102 opq=103 myp=100 myn=100 myb=103 myr=102 myq=104
>>>cc=100 mob=110 ks=155 pp=110 pw=110 avd=-2 sel=12
>>>
>>>Have fun,
>>>
>>>Jason :)
>>
>>
>> Hi Jason
>> Do you really think that your conclusion
>> based on 191 games at 10m/g vs Shredder 8
>> and (unfortunately) only 27 games at 80m/g
>> vs Shredder 8 may be right. For me: much
>> to less games played, none vs other engines
>> at slow time control. The good result of
>> CM9_Slayer at blitz may however encourage
>> other chesfriends to give your setting a trial.
>> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
>
>
>I've actually had played 100+ games at 40m/g against the top freeware engines
>and Slayer won by a large margin. I seem to have lost the pgn and so I didn't
>post anything about it on my website. I've also extensively tested this setting
>through several beta settings that did pretty well and progressively got better
>as i fine tuned settings.
>
>This setting has also done very well on FICS and seems to be playing a better
>game, and has increased my rating in all of the time controls.
>
>Jason
Hi Jason
Thanks for this clarification ... such important
things should be made public -:)
Kind regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.