Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:24:52 12/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2004 at 16:27:20, Peter Berger wrote: >aka round 2 ;) > >The complicated and exciting Hertneck variation of the French Winawer is >certainly very tough to understand for the computers. > >Movei out of book at move 15 chose 15. O-O, which is extremely untopical. Only >15. h4 can be the correct and logical move here, but I guess very few programs >will choose this move without book. It is possible that it is a mistake to use a book of common lines that is not big enough and if you choose to use a book that is not big enough then it is better to take the opponent out of book earlier(at least with white it is possible to do it with equal position). knowing half of the theory and using it is sometimes worse than knowing nothing. I read that one of the participants of the Israeli women championship learned it when she remembered some moves from the sicilian defense that she learned for the championship but did not know how to continue and she admitted that it was better for her not to use that line. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.