Author: John Coffey
Date: 09:32:31 01/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 1999 at 01:59:39, Laurence Chen wrote: >I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with your statements. It's like asking a GM >rated 2500+ to play at 1400 ELO which is impossible to accomplish. Of course you can make a 2500+ program have an option to play at 1400 elo. There are many ways to do it. (Some programs don't even try.) If it can play at one second per move then why couldn't it play at a tenth of a second per move or even less? Another way to do it is to increase the randomness. (i.e. don't differentiate between moves below a certain threshhold. That threshhold could be made pretty large if necessary.) I still like my idea of having levels where level 1 looks at 30 possibilities, level 2 at 60, level 3 at 120, level 4 at 240 etc. Best wishes, john coffey
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.