Author: George Sobala
Date: 00:22:23 12/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2004 at 03:21:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 04, 2004 at 03:10:07, George Sobala wrote: > >>Kurt >> >>I am intrigued by your results, because in my over 150 games with Gandalf 6.0, >>the only engine it has lost a match to is Shredder 8. >> >>I wish to attempt to replicate one of your Nunn-2 tests, but my computer is >>about twice as fast as yours, so I am thinking of trying aprroximately a >>40/20'+40/20'+20' time control. I wonder if you could post a sample position and >>a few lines of analysis by Gandalf-6 on your Athlon-1300 to show node-counts and >>time-to-ply, and I will fine tune the time difference to be as closely >>equivalent as possible. > >I think that it is important to compare not only gandalf6 because gandalf6 may >earn more speed from faster hardware and it may be a reason for different >results. > >Uri True. I was going to compare with CT15.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.