Author: George Sobala
Date: 03:14:14 12/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks for the info. A powerful test setup you have! I feel that an engine that gets disproportionately stronger on faster hardware (or longer time controls) is preferrable to one that does the opposite! It will only improve with time as our computers get faster. I want to rerun the Nunn2 match against CT15 on my Centrino 1.6GHz. Do you have a PGN of this match for me to compare? I will run it at the 20'/40 moves recurring. I will use ERT because I am still concerned about the possible Chessbase GUI UCI hash problem. Other UCI engine authors have certainly reported problems with the Chessbase GUI secretly and randomly resetting the hash to 1M, only discovered by looking at log files. Gandalf does not produce a log file, so can we be certain all is ok?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.