Author: Graham Banks
Date: 14:30:03 12/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2004 at 17:12:10, Dom Leste wrote: >On December 04, 2004 at 05:00:32, Graham Banks wrote: > >>Pentium 4 (3.2) >>256 mb hash >>Ponder off, No learning >>All using powerbook optimised >>3,4,5 EGTB's >>Deep Fritz 8 GUI >> >> >>Standings after Round 23 of 54 >> >>16.5 - Shredder 8 >>13.5 - CM9000 Assassin >>12.5 - Ruffian 2.1.0 >>12.0 - Deep Junior 8 >>11.0 - Pharaon 3.1 >>10.5 - Aristarch 4.50 >>10.5 - Deep Fritz 8 >>10.0 - CM10th Creep >>9.5 - Pro Deo 1.0 >>9.0 - Hiarcs 9 > > >Shredder launched the afterburners! CM9 assassin couldnt keep up with the >positional monster. Perhaps you might try the new settings from Jason's CM9 >Slayer or CM9 R1X next? > >Dom Ray is testing out Slayer against the top programs in order to get a comparison. You don't seriously think that another setting could be performing better in this field at a long time control do you? Most of the other settings seem to have been tested primarily at faster time controls. Ray's testing will give a true picture once he's finished. At present R1 and Assassin stand out above the others. Stay tuned! Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.