Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:33:57 12/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2004 at 17:16:25, Bouddha wrote: >Just have a look at the list !! > >1 Shredder 8.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2818 34 -32 481 70% 2673 >2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2809 24 -23 967 71% 2648 >3 Deep Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2790 26 -25 855 72% 2625 >4 Junior 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2782 27 -26 750 67% 2654 >5 Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2772 27 -25 801 70% 2624 >6 Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2769 24 -24 898 66% 2655 >7 Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2759 22 -22 1043 65% 2649 >8 Deep Junior 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2749 35 -33 439 64% 2644 >9 Hiarcs 9.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2747 26 -26 744 61% 2667 > >how can you say that Deep Junior 8 was never tested ?????? > >Junior 8 - Deep Junior 8 = 33 ELO points which is a big difference for an engine >that should be the same as tested on the same hardware. > >defenitively on my single cpu Junior 8 is much faster than Deep Junior 8 and >therefore assume that it will be the same with Junior 9 and Deep Junior 9 > >regards I see that you are right but I remember that Amir Ban never claimed that Deep Junior8 is better for a single processor(I even remember that he claimed that Deep Junior is slower for a single processor and suggested for people who have single processor to buy Junior and not deep Junior) so I assumed that it was not tested because it was not logical to waste time on testing it with single processor based on the data that Amir gave. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.