Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A Great Game

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 04:01:26 12/06/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 06, 2004 at 06:59:58, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 06, 2004 at 06:52:33, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On December 06, 2004 at 00:33:31, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>>
>>>Every so often when Zappa and Crafty play, they come up with some really
>>>brilliant moves and tough positions.  Somehow, when I watched this game I had an
>>>intense image of two boxers who just refused to give up, no matter how bloodied
>>>they were.  You can judge for yourself.  The opening was a French defense, with
>>>Zappa defending.  Zappa had a few tense moments, but it was able to get a very
>>>solid position, despite the horrible French bishop.  Zappa thought it was about
>>>equal, while Crafty liked white to the tune of about +0.6.  I guess the true
>>>value is somewhere in between; Black should draw but I think White has all the
>>>winning chances here.
>>>
>>>[D]2r1r1k1/3bq2p/p5pQ/Pp1pPp2/3P4/3B1R2/2P3PP/5RK1 b - - 0 24
>>>
>>>So they shuffled, as computers are wont to do, and Crafty was finally so happy
>>>with its position that it gave away the a5 pawn in order to prevent the draw.
>>>At this point Crafty was about +0.4, while Zappa thought it was winning by 0.7
>>>or so.  The shuffling continued, with Zappa trying to advance its passed a pawn
>>>without letting Crafty checkmate it on the kingside.
>>>
>>>[D]2r4k/7p/p3b1p1/qp1pPp2/3P1R2/2rB2R1/2P3PP/4Q1K1 w - - 0 38
>>>
>>>Here came the first problem.  Zappa had counted on Kg8, but white has a draw in
>>>that line.
>>>
>>>[D]2r5/6kp/4b1p1/1p1pPp2/pq1P3Q/2rB2R1/2P3PP/5RK1 b - - 0 45; bm Qf8; test
>>>position 1
>>>
>>>1... Kg7-g8 2. Rg3-h3 Rc3-c7 3. c2-c3 Qb4xc3 4. Bd3xb5 Qc3-b4 5. Bb5-a6 Rc8-b8
>>>6. Rf1-e1 a4-a3
>>> = (1.13)	Depth: 11/33	00:00:08.83	4885kN (553 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts)
>>>1... Kg7-g8 2. Qh4-f6 Rc3-c6 3. Rg3xg6 h7xg6 4. Qf6xg6 Kg8-h8 5. Qg6-h6 Kh8-g8
>>>6. Qh6-g6
>>> = (0.00)	Depth: 12/33	00:00:12.63	7287kN (577 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts)
>>>1... Qb4-f8 2. Rg3-h3 h7-h5 3. Rh3-g3 Kg7-h7 4. Bd3xb5 Rc3xg3 5. Qh4xg3 Qf8-b4
>>>6. Qg3-d3 a4-a3 7. Rf1-f3
>>> = (0.56)	Depth: 12/34	00:00:28.62	17188kN (600 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts)
>>>
>>>This let Crafty win the b5 pawn, and the shuffling continued.  Zappa was able to
>>>get its a pawn to a2, but it remained hampered by its horrible bishop.  Finally,
>>>just when Crafty thought it had equalized, Zappa struck:
>>>
>>>[D]8/r5k1/4b1p1/1q1pPp1p/3P4/2P3P1/p4K1P/R1QB4 b - - 0 68; bm f4! test position
>>>2
>>>
>>>1... f5-f4 2. g3xf4 Be6-f5 3. Bd1-c2 Bf5-g4 4. Kf2-g1 Qb5-e2 5. Bc2-b3 Bg4-e6 6.
>>>f4-f5 g6xf5 7. Qc1-g5 Kg7-h7
>>> = (1.14)	Depth: 13/36	00:00:38.98	29001kN (744 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts)
>>>
>>>After some complicated tactics, Zappa emerged with a Rook versus Crafty's 3
>>>passed pawns. When I was just about to celebrate a pretty win, Zappa threw the
>>>game away with Rf4??.  This is a really hard position for Zappa, because after
>>>Rf4 d5 it has a Rook and Bishop vs 2 connected passers, whereas after Bf5 it has
>>>a Rook vs 3 connected passers :)  Crafty gets it at 8 ply or so though.
>>>
>>>[D]8/7k/4Prp1/7p/2BP4/2P5/7P/1b4K1 b - - 0 82; bm Bf5!; test position 3
>>>
>>>After Rf4 Crafty was able to force the draw, although Zappa didn't realize it
>>>for another 10 moves. The final position:
>>
>>
>>Not a good test position.
>>
>>It is possible to find Bf5 for the wrong reason.
>>Movei also needs 8 plies to find it but needs depth 13 to find Crafty's d5(still
>>without a draw score).
>>
>>Note also that I expect zappa to find Bf5 after more time simply because it wins
>>material and from computer point of view it should not be.
>>
>>Movei after some time has fail high on Bf5
>>
>>I am also not sure if d5 force a draw and movei does not agree with capturing
>>the bishop after d5 and suggests the line d5 Bf5 d6 Re4
>>
>>At this moment of posting I see another fail high for d5 so maybe not capturing
>>the bishop also does not help.
>>I am surprised that zappa fail here relative to movei because I expect movei to
>>be weak in endgame considering the fact that it does not use hash for pruning.
>>
>>Uri
>
>It seems that the fail high was a wrong fail high.
>
>I also checked the position after Rxc4 and I find that movei can see a draw
>score after a minute of search and even has a positive score of +0.08 for white
>at depth 14.
>
>Maybe Crafty even missed a win but I will need more reliable program like yace
>to check it.
>
>Note that the version of movei that I used of movei is the public version and
>the cahnges that I did from it until now are only cosmetic changes like allowing
>more personalities and no change in the evaluation.
>
>Uri

I see after posting that the score at depth 15 is again negative score for
white.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.