Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:07:20 12/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2004 at 08:39:44, Bigler wrote: >On December 05, 2004 at 19:14:26, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On December 05, 2004 at 17:24:49, Murat wrote: >> >>> >>>on that list Deep Fritz8 does better then Fritz8, so we will not know about >>>junior9 and deep junior9 until they are tested. >>> >>> >>>Murat >> >>That's because Deep Fritz 8 was a later program than Fritz 8. It had many >>improvements, many months later than when Fritz 8 came out. >>I think that is the only reason. >>S.Taylor > >I would add that you can not compare Frit/Deep and Junior/Deep. >DeepFritz was always stronger than Fritz. Look Deep Fritz 7 and Fritz 7 Again Deep Fritz7 came out later than Fritz7. Same now >with Fritz 8 and Deep Fritz 8. In fact the Deep version in this case is not the >same as the single cpu chess software. Of course it is not the same because it came later. > >But Junior/Deep are I think the same but the "routine/algorithm" for the dual >makes it slower on single cpu. speed which is compensated when using a dual cpu. > >rgds Of course Junior and deep Junior is the same because it came at the same time. I do not think that it has to do something with the name of the program but only on the decision of the programmer when to release new version. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.