Author: Derek Paquette
Date: 12:26:14 12/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 07, 2004 at 15:21:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 07, 2004 at 14:18:43, Derek Paquette wrote: > >>On December 07, 2004 at 13:58:34, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 07, 2004 at 13:31:36, Derek Paquette wrote: >>> >>>>On December 07, 2004 at 07:05:46, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>Some "experts" predicted Arno to win from 6 - 0 to 4,5 - 1,5! What do they say >>>>>now? And Hyatt? >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>In my own opinion I feel that 'some' of the experts are behind on the times and >>>>that they do not realize the strength of these new programs. Which is strange >>>>to say or even suggest as most of them have their own programs or play regularly >>>>with top programs. I suppose some people are still caught back in the day where >>>>the human brain was and always WOULD be superior. >>> >>>The human brain is still superior. >>>The human brain generated the programs. >>> >>>Uri >> >>That does not mean it is superior, >> >>human brains created cars but they can move a lot faster over land than us. We >>created something to outmatch ourselves, (ships, jets, cars...everything) and >>now chess > >the superiority is of the programmers or the developers so the superiority is >still of humans. > >there are humans behind the winners even if the winners are cars or computers. > >Uri of course i agree, but the human is smart enough to allow the computer to utilize all of its strengths so with its particular purpose it is superior, ie. the computer programs will beat the programs in chess out of a 100 game match at ANY time control.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.