Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dann, did anyone get back to you how long it took to solve these ??

Author: Les Fernandez

Date: 22:24:44 12/07/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 07, 2004 at 02:39:54, Ingo Bauer wrote:

>Hello
>
>>>Les, take a look at the positions.  THEY ARE ALL MATE IN 1.  No one posted any
>>>results because watching a computer trying to solve a mate-in-one is about as
>>>fun as sticking a pencil in your eye.
>>>
>>I think that the reason that noone posted results is that the epd is too long
>>and most people have no function to read epd file and using a program manually
>>to analyze the positions is no fun.
>
>Is there any reson behind this and what is the solution for each position? Is
>the only aim to FIND a mate? If that is all just copy all the FEN lines into  a
>"positions.epd", start the Shredder Classic 1.1 GUI with your favorite engine,
>goto "Mode" -> "Analyse positions", select the "positions.epd", give an extra
>ply of "0" (zero) and start it. You will get 140 "No solution given" and as a
>result of this a 140 "Wrong solution" for every single position but a engine
>should find 140 mates (not necessarily the shortest one)
>
>S8 need 1 minute 49 seconds with 256 MB Hash on a A@2200MHz. I am sure there are
>engines that are faster.
>
>Bye
>Ingo

Hi Ingo,

Thank for your input.  As I mentioned to Anthony and Uri if I find the post
which Dann posted which was expected to be mmuch more difficult I will repost.

Thanks,

Les



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.