Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 13:44:24 12/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2004 at 16:02:10, Matthew Hull wrote: >These were all 30 0 games played on a single Duron 900mhz machine, so 450mhz >effectively for each program. These would be blitz games on more up-to-date >hardware > >Learning on. >Pondering on. >hash 96m >hashp 24m >book width 99 > > > >xboard: Match Crafty-19.16 vs. Crafty-19.17: final score 24-23-53 (equal) >xboard: Match Crafty-19.13 vs. Crafty-19.17: final score 43-13-44 (wipe out) >xboard: Match Crafty-19.13 vs. Crafty-19.15: final score 22-20-58 (equal) > > >Crafty's current ICC rating drop in blitz coincides with the advent of 19.16/17. > This seems to agree with other results that put pre-1916 versions as stronger. > >I think something must be seriously out of whack with 19.17, at least against >computers and at short time controls. Others state the same and while I suspect a bug in the search of Crafty, I can not pin point it. I have asked Robert though. Despite all that, I have the best results with 19.17. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.