Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: underpromotion?

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 03:57:57 01/19/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 19, 1999 at 02:07:04, KarinsDad wrote:

>On January 19, 1999 at 01:05:41, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote:
>
>>As other post answer the question of underpromotion, I think I'll mention that
>>when people here bring it up, its usually in relation to the Junior program,
>>which does not yet have the code for reconizing when it would be more benificial
>>to underpromote in order to win the game more quickly, or at all. (Just about
>>every other top program does calculate underpromotion lines)
>>
>>Amazingly, the program appears to play incredibly strongly anyway, (Kramnik said
>>some complimentry stuff about it in the last Chess Base Magazine, and it has won
>>the World Micro Computer Championship), and so people wonder how much even more
>>strong it might be if this small feature is added to the next version.
>>
>>mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict!
>
>Probably not significantly. When was the last time you underpromoted in a game
>or had a computer do it to you? It would be nice if the program was complete,
>though. It would also be interesting in the computer vs. computer tournaments if
>someone went through and calculated some statistics on this.
>
>I assume Junior allows underpromotions as legal moves (if it doesn't, then you
>could not play real chess against it, it would be a variant), it just doesn't
>either generate them itself or what? It considers them only if every other move
>leads to mate?
>
>Do you know any details on this (I haven't read the other posts on this).
>
>KarinsDad :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I posted a game about a month ago in which Nimzo99 underpromoted two times
against Junior 5.0 to win the game.  The first was a knight and the second
underpromotion was to a rook(The only move).  Also, in recent Chess Life
magazine there was a problem,mate in 8 I think, that involved underpromotion.
Junior thought it was mate in 4 or something like that because it did not allow
for the under promotion.  This makes me worry about using Junior for analysis in
games where undrpromotion is possible.  I still like the program's style of
play.
Jim Walker



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.