Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:29:24 12/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2004 at 17:23:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 10, 2004 at 16:31:50, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>However, if both programs were to play a 386, my money is on Genius. Shredder >>wouldn't even finish evaluating 1 node before its time was up, so it would >>forfeit :) >> >>anthony > >I do not know if shredder works on 386 but if it can work then I will be >surprised if it is not clearly better than genius at 120/40 > >I think that >120/40 at 386 is slower time control than 1 minutes/40 moves on A1200 and >I also think that shredder has no problem to beat Genius at 1 minute/40 moves on >A1200. > >Uri I am not sure about Shredder at all , but I think it is a safe bet to say that Tiger is clearly stronger than Genius on a 386 at 120/40. In case there were a working ,moderately current version of Hiarcs I'd bet on it too. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.