Author: Ernst A. Heinz
Date: 06:38:19 01/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 1999 at 08:34:47, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 19, 1999 at 07:41:16, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: > >>I already said that I have no problems with agreeing to disagree about various >>aspects of overall moderational style. > >Normal; one can't satisfy ALL members. > >>The consequence of the disagreements for me personally is that I stop to >>actively contribute to CCC for the time being -- no more, no less. >>=Ernst= > >A pity you react offended just because you disagree in one or two minor points. As I repeatedly said I am *not* offended. I already mentioned several times that I have no bad feelings against any of you. I simply do not want to actively contribute in a forum which gets moderated in the current style -- no more, no less. You should simply accept this without looking for evil interpretations. This decision expresses my disagreement with the current moderational style and seems to be the best democratic power I have to possibly influence the remaining CCC membership to vote for less strict moderators the next time. Of course, I cannot prevent anybody from assuming that my decision is mostly based on hurt pride. This is the obvious price I have to pay here. >Will representing all 3 of us apologized politely. As I already said, I greatly appreciate your character and courage as demonstrated by the apology. >Are YOU able to? Certainly, if there is something that needs an apology from me. At the moment I do not see such misbehaviour on my side. Please tell me what you think I ought to apologize for. If it concerns my public quote of the moderational email message, then I will flatly deny because I still deem it completely justified. Bruce's example involving the congressman very well illustrated why. IMO, you should also just agree to disagree here. =Ernst=
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.