Author: Dana Turnmire
Date: 22:28:53 12/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2004 at 23:27:38, Zach Wegner wrote: >I am not sure about this, my evaluation function sucks and I get it in 8 ply/27 >secs. > > > 7 5.076 +0.29 1... Ne5 2. Rf1 Ncd3 3. Nce2 Rf8 4. f4 Bh6 (622k) >< 7> 5.781 +0.29 1... Ne5 2. Rf1 Ncd3 3. Nce2 Rf8 4. f4 Bh6 (721k) > 8 19.558 +0.32 1... Ne5 2. Rf1 Rf8 3. Nce2 Ncd3 4. f4 Bh6 5. Qe3 >(2565k) > 8 26.953 +0.46 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. Na4 Qa7 5. Qf1 >Nxe1 (3609k) >< 8> 27.678 +0.46 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. Na4 Qa7 5. Qf1 >Nxe1 (3704k) > 9 34.583 +0.46 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. Na4 Qa7 5. Qf1 >Nxe1 (4689k) >< 9> 44.278 +0.46 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. Na4 Qa7 5. Qf1 >Nxe1 (5973k) > 10 1:00 >= +0.66 1... Rxa1!! (8322k) > 10 1:16 +1.44 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. c5 Qxc5 5. Na4 >Qa7 6. Qf1 Nxe1 (13949k) ><10> 1:07 +1.44 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. c5 Qxc5 5. Na4 >Qa7 6. Qf1 Nxe1 (15227k) > 11 3:07 +1.63 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. c5 Qb4 5. Na2 >Qxe1+ 6. Rxe1 Nxf2 7. Nxc6 bxc6 8. Kxf2 dxc5 (31977k) ><11> 4:13 +1.63 1... Rxa1 2. Rxa1 Nxf2 3. Qxf2 Nd3 4. c5 Qb4 5. Na2 >Qxe1+ 6. Rxe1 Nxf2 7. Nxc6 bxc6 8. Kxf2 dxc5 (34830k) The Designer 2100 finds the correct move in 4 hours and 5 minutes after searching three moves into the eighth ply.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.